1,361 karma · joined February 27, 2007
Buffet has gone on record multiple times (cnn, print interviews) saying he would be the person who buys the mortgages from the banks and resales them later if he could get a 700 billion dollar or comparable loan.
The mortgages are current artificially low because everyone is scared. If you can buy them low and sell them once the fear is gone, you could make a ton of money.
People will make money on this situation, the government will completely mess up some aspects of this, articles will be written 'exposing' all the problems.
best part for me, and how people aren't really getting why you would bail out banks.
email paul - at - deluux.com
before you can answer, what are you trying to be known for, and where are you publishing currently.
the first cycle is characterized as something found, launched, or created. (gold in california)
2nd, is everyone is doing it, most important thing ever and you are missing out (gold rush)
3rd, is more subtle and often missed as a trend, it is characterized by counter thought, (nobody actually got rich in california) (which is mostly true about gold)
you can see it in a lot of places.
1) facebook platform launched
2) land grab in progress
3) nobody makes money on facebook apps
newpapers have to tell a story, and these stories are the kinda angles that work over and over. there are many variations and subtleties and articles which don't fit, but in any big news trend, you can find some articles which fall directly in to those three categories.
this story is category 3, readers! everything is ok! you've been hearing about something, but everything is ok! you aren't missing anything!
he says in all likelihood, a guy in charge setup a malicious route or "report" saying they could access youtube faster than they really could. which means, everyone trying to get to youtube, went through pakistan because it was the fastest way to youtube. so all youtube traffic went to pakistan, which was the ddos part.
why isn't this a huge problem? it kinda is. the system shouldn't be able to be taken down. But, it isn't a huge problem because nobody actually does this.
Apparently, isps pay a lot for their access, and this kinda thing is a good way of paying a lot more and loosing all your money and not having internet, which is the opposite of the business they are in.
i've never ever heard of something like this happening, or about these 'reports.' so... maybe nobody should listen to me. but my friend is usually right about this stuff.
mongrel doesn't do it for the same reason tar doesn't support encryption (pgp does!).
mongrel is designed to serve requests, not balance requests or spawn itself. sure it could, but it doesn't have to. it is just as easy to have another project spawn more mongrels. That way if I want to to write software just for looking at my servers and making more mongrels, i can, very easily. Otherwise i have to look in mongrel's code.
100req/sec * 7 mongrels => 700 req/sec total. and other simple math.
they aren't spawned automatically. you setup a number and distribute to them. there are ways of getting them to spawn automatically, but it isn't inherent to mongrel itself.
making semiconductors is a ton of math, theory, and layout work. are you talking about actually using masks to do the doping?
Let's assume the 1-year government bond yield is at 5% (it's not, but it simplifies the math, so bear with me). As a gross oversimplification, that means that a $20 investment today will produce a risk-free return of 5% ($1) at the end of a year. The converse is also true: if a risk-free investment produces $1 in revenues over the course of a year, then the investment should be valued at $20.
looking good ;)
paul, socialmoth
i'd love speaking tips/feedback in general. or tech whatever.
as long as there is a lot money in search, there will be a lot of people competing for it, and people funding them. And the very least it will do is keep google on its toes, which is good.