251 karma · joined May 2, 2013
There will always be a constituency for people who love to play victims to social media companies. That should not affect their decisions.
Also, those dashboards are misleading. For the North American market the proportion of older phones is less than half of what the dashboard displays
I'm not quite as cynical when it comes to bureaucrats (military contractors aside), because as we can see in some of the recent teachers strikes, it makes sense to tax oil/gas corporations who are making full use of states infrastructure to for the benefit of themselves (and workers etc). The tax rate is not really affecting how much they invest. [1]
I'm with you on corporate influence though. However, I think the answer there is to limit corporate influence of elections, say by disallowing funding of candidate specific ads and limiting the $ they can put towards issue lobbying.
[1]https://qz.com/1243098/oklahoma-teachers-strike-how-income-t...
I did try out the windows phone emulation though, and was pretty impressed wrt speed. Video and camera wasn't working yet, but they had an intelligent strategy to stub and reimpment play services and billing.
Amusingly, I had to buy a $50 wp on ebay, because the one microsoft gave me when they flew a bunch of mobile devs to redmond to ask what tools we wanted, the one they gave us was not one of the two models that supported the beta. I'm only salty because, like wp itself, it was never officially killed, and we just had to figure it out when the program stopped updating.
It can be pretty demoralizing when you look at it from that perspective. We really need to have a conversation that even though passion is important and great for quality of life, it can hide real systemic problems and inequities
The banning of gamergate discussion didn't sit well for me, but I don't go to /v/ so I didn't care too much. Unless there was a specific explanation for it, I imagine the decision was to stop raiding and harassment, which seems reasonable considering it was borne out of two specific cases of harassing sjws. I found any gamergate discussion nauseating after about a month since it quickly came to encompass every single aspect of misogyny real or perceived in the gaming industry and the stakes themselves were so incredibly low. I cannot physically care about kotaku reviews. It would be like taking nyt trend pieces seriously.
That was a long aside. Anyway, was there ever a reason given about gamergate banning or a reason to think it was a situation similar to sinfest?