367 karma · joined November 9, 2011
Why do you think the '?' would be "inspired by legal"?
"Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize."
EDIT: looking through older comments, it sounds like it originally had a '?' that they later replaced with a '.' .
I suspect that this is the point GP was trying to make. A criticism of anti-racism I've encountered many times is that most arguments for something (e.g. parks) being racist or white supremacist are unfalsifiable and based solely on a specific demographic outcome (e.g. national park visitors are disproportionately white) while ignoring other factors.
The profit center vs societal necessity way of looking at these things is super interesting and definitely new to me (at least in such a concise form). In this framing, I'm not sure I want healthcare to move, since everything I can think of on the societal necessity side of the spectrum is slow moving and underfunded. Police departments tend to be underfunded and slow to adopt new technology (though maybe that's a feature), while hospital facilities and medical treatments seem to advance quickly to adapt to new discoveries/tech despite insane FDA regulations as a barrier.
If we flipped a switch and made law enforcement a profit center, what would that look like? I'll go first, but I sincerely want to hear your take, as I'm sure I'm missing something. I assume they still have to enforce local/state/federal laws, but they will somehow be subject to the same tug of war over tech/efficiency advances and regulations around safety/civil rights. I hope we pay them directly/willingly, rather than them simply making bank on speeding/redlight cameras or parking tickets. Maybe we have to pay some kind of crime insurance, where rates (i.e. risk) changes depending on crime stats in the area defined by the insurance companies, which could incentivize the police to meaningfully reduce crime. Insurance would pay out when crimes are solved, and any attempts to fudge the numbers by the police would be insurance fraud. Sounds wild.
> one should be careful not to allow emotions and sensitivities to creep in, to do the ideological work for you
Attributing all questioning/resistance of DEI to emotions and sensitivities is pretty condescending. GP was clear and reasoned about the contradictions they saw in DEI efforts, and your dismissal of them is quite frustrating and unproductive.
Also, are you saying that the work that needs to be done is, in fact, ideological? Ideology should be nowhere near this.
[0] https://twitter.com/IanCutress/status/1511716678199132173
This question bugs me quite a bit, mainly because it shouldn't matter why someone needs a parking space; there are many valid reasons that I'm sure you could think of if you spent even a minute thinking about it. If someone does actually need a parking space, there should be some way to have one that takes into consideration scarcity and other market forces so Dave can decide whether it is worth it to live there/continue living there based on his own needs and means. Many cities have systems for this that usually involve permits that need to be paid for and while I'm sure none of them are perfect, it's better than subsidizing spaces or outright banning them. And if the locality decides that there just can't be any parking spaces, so be it, but it should not be because those deciding are completely lacking empathy and are so unimaginative that they can't think of a reason why someone might want something as benign and common as having a car in a city. Driving, parking, private car ownership, etc as a whole and clearly imperfect, but the reality of public transportation, especially outside of cities and in the United States, is abysmal.
Since then, the only time I've interacted with Vimeo was to watch episodes of IKEA Heights[0], as at the time this was the only place where it was officially distributed (i.e. in original quality, rather than re-encoded and re-uploaded to youtube). Great, weird, short series if you are interested. The play between the drama/acting, and then being brought back to reality by being caught, is very fun.
If I recall correctly, this was around when they removed recommendation type features from their site, which was the first sign that I saw, personally, that they were moving away from something consumer focused.
The DCP system was intriguing to me. They made DCP sound like a pain in the ass, requiring expensive projection equipment and some kind of special internet connection (they weren't familiar with that part) to receive films not distributed physically or to receive updates to films. Later, I looked up DCP on Wikipedia[1] and found it enlightening. The thing that stood out to me was the use of asymmetric encryption to ensure a particular DCP distribution was only able to be played on a particular projector, thanks to a symmetric key for the film being encrypted with a projector's public key, and decrypted using the private key stored on some kind of FIPS compliant HSM.
[0] https://vimeo.com/channels/ikeaheights [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Cinema_Package
Pulling the displays out of the cabs to work on them is also a huge pain. The size/weight has been mentioned here a few times; imagine having to pull a giant one out of an abdomen-height hole in a cab, and putting it back in without resting it on the plastic shell framing it.
EDIT: read the article in chrome's reader mode, thanks for the tip!
Could they be doing this title change, at least in theory, as an information security measure? Competitors and journalists could potentially corroborate (or have an easier time corroborating) leaks if they can verify that a former employee is the position/level they claim to be.
I worked briefly at Apple as contractor doing some professional services integration type stuff in the datacenter space, and one thing that struck me was how secrecy seemed to ooze it's way into super unexpected places. This was to the point that I wondered if an infosec team had a hand in designing some of the systems I was working with that were way closer to the power lines than they were to the products they were designing. This was also around the time that I was reading about Apple's "Worldwide Loyalty Team" and how they would plan operations to catch people leaking.
As an aside, does anyone know how accurate the reporting was/is on the "Worldwide Loyalty Team"? Looking back it seems absurd, to the point where it makes more sense to me as a myth than fact.
Ceramic[0] (a sort of mutability layer on top of IPFS) solves this off-chain by using your crypto wallet to authenticate a DID (their DIDs are known as 3id[1]) which can have a list of socials and crypto wallets associated with them (using their IDX[2] system and the schemas called alsoKnownAs[3] and cryptoAccounts[4], respectively), and the validations are made possible by systems called IdentityLink[5] (verifies similar to Keybase) and Caip10Link[6] (sign a message with your wallet) (respectively). The Caip10Link also allows reverse lookup of a DID from a blockchain address. A reference implementation of these systems in action can be found at https://self.id/ .
Grain of salt: I'm working on a project that makes heavy use of Ceramic.
[0] https://developers.ceramic.network/learn/advanced/overview/ [1] https://github.com/ceramicstudio/js-3id-did-provider [2] https://developers.idx.xyz/learn/overview/ [3] https://github.com/ceramicstudio/datamodels/tree/main/packag... [4] https://github.com/ceramicstudio/datamodels/tree/main/packag... [5] https://developers.ceramic.network/tools/identitylink/overvi... [6] https://developers.ceramic.network/streamtypes/caip-10-link/...