418 karma · joined August 31, 2011
Easy to enforce? I dunno - why not require country of origin for packaging?
But assuming that won't happen - sounds like an opportunity for US jobs.
Plastic might make decent bricks for building.
E.g. Free trade - easy to love for consumers, economists, and people whose jobs aren't so easily transferable. Not so much for factory workers.
The old jobs left, and the new ones which people were assured would materialize because of all of the new prosperity didn't.
Another part of the problem seems to lie in skepticism and how to properly apply it. The closest I think anyone in the US comes to seeing a substantive debate is on the Sunday morning political shows and I'm sure it's still wrong, wrong, and wrong.
https://www.seattletimes.com/business/amazon/amazons-employe...
A project that might help US Soccer is to poach good athletes from other sports who would have trouble getting a scholarship in their current sport.
For example - a HS American football player with great speed who weighs less than 200 lbs, doesn't bench or squat very well, and is not a kicker.
Or a baseball player who can't come around on a 90 mph fastball. What inspires me here is how similar a good (feet-first) base slide is to a soccer tackle.
Or a 5'11" basketball player not named Allen Iverson.
To me, the question is at what age can soccer skills be taught for world-class results?
It's my belief that saving some money is good because it gives you options when times get tough.
But, I fear that having a large pile of cash will just be hoovered up by the MDs after a major illness. They know your financial position and will bill accordingly.
To those who know exactly what they want, it doesn't matter as much, but for those who want to compare a RAV4 to a CR-V from the same lot, it's unbeatable.
That said, the recently reported glut in used cars probably negates some of CarMax's advantage. I bought my last car from a curbside dealer.
It surprises me every day that we aren't in full-throated, Molotov-lobbing anarchy or mass suicide.
And that was before 2016.
Another model, found in utilities, fixes the cost point, so when demand falls, prices rise. Did you ever buy into your electric company's "conservation program" and cut your consumption, only to have your rates rise?
Congrats, you just got rick-rolled by capitalism, comrade sucker.
But first, an aside - I wish I could remember the name of the YouTube video that described the UK as a theocracy - because the Queen is also the "pope" of the Church of England.
A lot of people - MIT and myself included - fall into the trap of comparing places like Saudi to a theoretical perfect state which we'll call Utopia. The pitfalls of such comparisons I leave as an exercise to the reader.
But let's talk about MIT's overall contribution to the advancement of human rights. How many of their grads have gone on to work for the NSA? How many of their Chinese students now find employ with the Chinese government? How many government contracts for intrusive surveillance or weapons of mass destruction has MIT taken over the years?
Answer: Classified. But probably a lot.
That pushes the question as to whether "regular" law enforcement would involve itself in weed searches or if a state revenue department would handle it. Moonshiners might have a useful perspective on this.
In the end, though, even the most entitled and pampered aristo-plutocrat has to get out of bed or at least eat food and drink liquids to stay alive.