Wouldn't I have the same problem with passwords? I would lose my phone and be unable to two factor log in to my Gmail account or bank from someone else's device?
2,153 karma · joined October 2, 2018
It's also a rhetorical move I've seen several times here...
If you really want to compare apples to apples you need to test Gemini models against other models using the same third party search harness.
Otherwise you are largely measuring how much computation the model provider is allocating to a search harness.
Anecdotally I'd rate Gemini behind Claude and OpenAI models at fiction and I can't find any benchmarks showing Gemini is the clear winner at this task.
If I like the novel, an alternative version where things happen differently would be fine.
The problem isn't that it's different. The problem is quality.
A lot of Isekai stories are crap but you can still rank them in terms of the author's ability or inability to have a creative POV that elevates the material.
And no I don't think asking the A.I. to write the next 2000 words would require it to have the entire novel planned out. Not all writers even outline in advance.
If so I'm hoping we can track them down and have them tell us if they think this is AGI.
This is like saying AI developers should be qualified to evaluate the effacy of a model without testing the model.
A major correction would be a bummer but we were never entitled to these abnormal gains in the first place.
Doesn't the Chinese Room posit an AI good at the task of communication?
You seem to believe that regulation is "ethics backed by law".
As this is not true, your counter example is not even on point.
Wouldn't you need the prompt to know the probability of the next token?
I'm not actually suggesting there's a good reason for market swings, just that bad news shouldn't necessarily cause the market to go down.