763 karma · joined October 6, 2011
The gyroscope data most certainly would not allow one to do the same.
Microsoft Research was manually computing a motion map using heavy image-processing techniques that they then used to decide which frames to use and how to align them. Their work can do things like throw away a series of 'noisy' frames that wouldn't fit the overall scene motion. For instance, if you had a head mounted camera and were riding around on your bike, it could throw away the moments where you look both ways before crossing the street.
Instagram's technology utilizes extra sensor data to make their frame corrections. As far as I can tell from the brief article, the technology doesn't do much besides stabilization. That's not to belittle it, as it's a really neat application demonstrating the benefits of mobile sensor integration. And you might be able to create a similar motion map using the gyroscope data that the folks at Microsoft create through their image processing techniques!
YouTube LiveStream combining a few of the webcam sources, a twitter feed and a map of the earthquakes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoISDUAPNgc
Kind of neat to see how much information we have access to.
Neat developments, excited to see how they shake out.
Is that not the case here?
Similarly, Britain's protesters have demanded Uber to do away with fare estimates.
Notice how these complaints aren't in the form of: Let us do what Uber is doing. Rather, they take the form: Stop letting Uber do what it's doing. The Taxi owners want to have their cake and eat it too. They want to continue to protect their business models by placing artificial limits on competition, and they seek to disallow novel technology that would make their fare structure less opaque.
In Britain, Uber’s app rose to the second spot on Tuesday in the travel section of Apple’s download store, while it ranked fifth on Google’s Play store for phones using the Android operating system.
A similar trend is appearing in other places in Europe.
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/11/taxi-protests-again...
Looks like it's already happening. I have a hard time seeing this end well for the taxi companies.
Can anyone spot any big names that are absent, other than Apple?
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/cancer-care-in-the-u-s-v...
0:18 -- Air Review - H
1:10 -- Moderat - Bad Kingdom
1:56 -- Air Review - Young
Wait, what?
http://www.theverge.com/2013/11/19/5123004/rdio-lays-off-emp...
The music streaming business seems like an extraordinarily difficult place to compete.
My only complaint with the service so far is that they haven't made adding gapless playback a priority.
Frankly, if they did that, they wouldn't make very much money. They can demand money from advertisers because they have an information advantage over everyone else. That information advantage gives them an incentive to protect your personal information. After all, if they leaked the information a competitor could use it to formulate competitive advertising profiles, which would drive down earnings.
Edit: I wanted to add a few more thoughts since I let it spin around in my mind a bit. I think if you followed the line of argument regarding Google's profit motive as a corporation, you could reach the conclusion that their users' privacy(that is, the distribution of their private information) is a prerogative of theirs to protect. Their viability as a corporation depends on their profiles being the most accurate, and on being under their sole ownership. As such, they are driven to protect them.
I would conjecture that the profit motive for their need to protect their information has led to their relatively robust consumer protection ratings by groups like the EFF[0].
--------------
In my mind, if wages for other forms of employment aren't similarly inflated, it makes a much stronger argument for a further bifurcated society.
Chrome spans at least 7(And that's a conservative estimate) Operating Systems. Firefox the same. And both update in a sane manner.
It's nice that Microsoft offers a good solution to the 5% of users on the cutting edge, but they are still ludicrously behind the curve.
I think it's a great idea, and it's the only way I see the web moving forward at a reasonable pace.
----
Hi,
Barry Abrahamson here. A bit of context to my comment about the stability of Apache. We started WordPress.com using the Litespeed web server, but decided that we wanted to maintain as much of an open source stack as possible. We looked at lighttpd but had lots of issues with memory usage (leaks?) so we naturally turned to Apache. It worked mostly as expected performance and functionality wise. Keep in mind this was back in the Apache 2.0 days. Our problem was that deploying configuration changes which required a graceful restart under production traffic levels didn't work very well. About 10% of the time it either failed to reload the configuration, Apache stopped responding completely, or connections were dropped. Keep in mind that we were reloading ~1000 machines at once, but 10% is a pretty high failure rate. Yes, I know we could have removed machines from production, reloaded the configuration, and then put them back, but it's slow and error-prone, even if automated.
This is when we started looking at nginx. The nginx configuration reload works as expected all of the time, so that was enough to make us invest more time in the software. The transition was non-trivial since we had thousands of lines of .htaccess files which had to be translated to nginx configs, but it was worth it. Today, nginx is the "Swiss Army Knife" of our software stack. We use it for everything we can. I joke that we would use it as a database server if we could :)
------
As a side note, this may be the first useful comment on a Wired article I've ever seen.
[1]: http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-157.html
[2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._incarceration_rates_1...
- Freedom Host's founder arrested in Ireland for potential extradition on American child pornography distribution charges.
- Odd Javascript snippets found on sites hosted by Freedom Host. Initial investigations seem to point towards a possible 0-day targeting Firefox.
If the delivered Javascript is a browser-breaker, this strongly suggests someone is collecting the actual identities of the Tor users.
The truth, of course, is that those rockstars account for a very, very small portion of the sought after visas. The vast majority of the allocations are for average professionals at companies far from the bleeding edge.
It seems odd to me that we would put in such an effort to import average workers when there is both not an insignificant number of unemployed American tech workers, and a large number of tech-educated American workers pursuing other vocations. This smells more like a failure of employers to lure the workers they need than of a true shortage.
I do think top companies should be able to scout internationally for top talent and bring them back to live and work in the country. But top talent demands top dollar, so there needs to be a bar. A company must be willing to pay them significantly more than their position's average salary. If they're the best of the best, they're worth it.
To stick with the soccer analogy, how much more do you think someone like Lionel Messi gets paid than a junior league player, or even an average pro player? It's understood in sports that you must pay top dollar to get top talent. I don't think it's too much to expect industry to do the same.
Facebook/Google/Twitter/Microsoft/Amazon aren't the major users of H-1B Visas. Consulting firms are.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2013/04/03/176134...