Apple was really good at making basic consumer ideas work not at inventing stuff. Most inventions (by apple, MS) are based on older ideas. Don't get the invention religion anyway, who cares if apple was first or not. Just use wat you like
494 karma · joined July 1, 2010
Apple was really good at making basic consumer ideas work not at inventing stuff. Most inventions (by apple, MS) are based on older ideas. Don't get the invention religion anyway, who cares if apple was first or not. Just use wat you like
It is a shame that BlackBerry tried to market BlackBerry OS as an consumer OS. Also most gadget reviewers like games and the latest social media platforms so it seems silly to send a unit for review to them. I think they failed to market it correctly while the market for this type of device is smaller than for an iPhone it is bigger than the number of BlackBerry devices sold.
I really hope they continue to make BlackBerry OS devices I dread the day I have to go back to android or iphone
SP is a mesh up of several software suits slowly coming to getter, it is getting better every release. SP could also be the right choice depending in your needs. Mainly work group portals but those tend to fail (as in not being used) since most of the time there is no proper business case nor business processes in place to support the grand idea
So yeah the 10 pages are right as far as I'm concerned ;)
501 - 1,000 $15 1,001 - 1,050 $20
5$ for 50 mails ..... 10 cent per email wow, I think you could get a better deal at the post office :)
It's is an older post, but new for me and new for the HN system :)
As a user I'm happy that Google is making sure that I can hop device manufactures without loosing my apps or functionality, if everybody would roll out there own app store and removed Google's you would be locked in with the OEM. Now you can safely change to a different phone, also they don't mind you downloading the Google apps when using an alternative ROM.
Android is open source but does that mean that you are not aloud to make money of it by providing closed source apps and service, many open source companies do that. The work that went in to Android if freely available for competitors. Lots of kernel enchantments went back in to Linux and now you have Ubuntu touch and Firefox OS both based on the Android kernel which in turn is based on Linux, how cool is that.
From the top of my head
Ajax (very handy but lot of times misused and misunderstood or just DHTML)
No SQL (can be handy, but for some people it is like a religion)
XML (why use CSV when you are able to use XML)
Cloud (Oh by cloud you mean the internet?)
and many more :)
Just bought the Android version :)
People that are going to buy a steam box are people that would otherwise buy a ps/4 and/or a XBOX one. Nobody cares that the PS/4 is running BSD nobody is going to buy a PS4 because it runs BSD. Microsoft failed to understand this as well, "we have three OS's running on the X1", yeah that will sell a game system like cupcakes. Almost nobody is going to buy a game/entertainment system based on the OS. It boils down to cost, marketing, what your friends are getting, launch games and exclusives.
If the steam box is going to have similar h/w and price point as the PS4 and X1 and a couple of cool new games like HL3, it will have more games at launch than the PS4 and X1 combined (and as an extra bonus you can play your games on a PC running Windows or Linux). You want to play HL3 on a console? buy a Steam Box.
As for bu-ray support, if it turns out to be a main point of consideration they could make a player that support it. But looking at the PS3 vs X360 it wasn't a main seller for most people.
TL;DR it is not so much about all desktops running Linux but most of everything else
edit: Both company's that you mention should just sponsor the project and/or pay you to work on it full time as this is the backbone of there business