1,643 karma · joined October 3, 2014
Consider how architects and engineers would use PDF plans of a high rise building.
You could ensure only top content made it by setting a minimum karma limit. It was a way of producing content 24/7.
I only did a couple of trial pages to test out the concept -- I never made any money from it nor had any intention to monetize -- but I'm almost completely certain that it was a method used by dozens of blackhats to make autoblogs for the purposes of ad revenue. You could even fake a comment history or have a "unique" title by selecting the top comments from the Reddit posts. Once you have one recipe down, you can just copy it for other subreddits. And there was an endless amount of hyper-focused niche subreddits that you can instantly plug into.
Fun times.
FunkyBob (Curtis Maloney) is also a staple with Django, he's spent years and years helping people and asking for nothing in return.
The reason why we accepted Netflix' DRM model is because they started off with "we encourage you to share your account!" which everyone jumped on. Now that we have all the b/s associated with digital content, they're pulling back. Which is okay... because we can pull back too.
A good example is when HBO decided to partner-up in an exclusive deal with a horrible price-gouging cable media provider, many Australians decided to pirate Game of Thrones instead. I don't know of a single person who paid for it. I know of professional suit-wearing offices that hosted watch parties for episodes that were pirated. And everyone knew... and nobody cared. I think the final numbers were that about 8% of the entire Australian population pirated the show. If only HBO had decided to not screw over an entire country then perhaps they would have made a lot more money.
The issue is that they will never have their fill. They will always be hungry, and if Netflix could charge you 10% of your annual income and get away with it, then they will. And a great example of this is with college textbooks.
I don't think I'm entitled to media, but I don't think the creators are entitled to my dollars either for digital content. I just don't care about content creators in this regard. This might come across as terrible, but I couldn't care less if it leads to their bankruptcy. If they want to produce something at a reasonable price, then great. If they won't, then it won't be paid for. That's the playing field they're choosing to enter. If they don't like it, they are free to exit.
There's no morality in it either way -- paying for content doesn't make a person any more or less immoral than someone who doesn't.
Adblocking is in a similar boat, insofar that if you think that stripping me of any privacy without my consent is okay, then you're going to be quickly disappointed with how well my pi-hole setup works.
I'd encourage you to take a step back and look at it as if you're dealing with software patents, cause that's all copyright law for digital media really is. And choosing to have a patent called "PROVIDING AN INTERNET THIRD PARTY DATA CHANNEL"[0] doesn't mean people are immoral if they don't pay. It also doesn't mean they're moral if they do.
[0] https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-project-jengo-saga-how-cloud...
If they want to take an inch, I'm prepared to revert to hosting a media server for all of my friends and family with all sorts of wonderful cat videos.
The difference with Israel, specifically in regards to hacking, is purely the amount of government support and protection independent actors receive for things that might otherwise be considered nefarious in other countries.
Even the ones who do not want to reconcile are happy to jump into the green buses[0] and go to Idlib. They were happy because they knew they were safe. There were no extra-judicial murders, no retributions, no nothing.
If Bilal Abdul Kareem from OGN TV was able to leave Aleppo unharmed, why would aid workers be targeted?
This isn't some sort of conspiracy theory - it's just common-sense tactics for the Syrian government. It also doesn't mean that post-war there won't be retributions. I'm sure there will be. But there is no reason to suggest why aid workers would be high in that list when that same list contains some of the most deplorable extremist militia groups too.
Talking about the SDF is important, because the article is about what happens when the PYD leaves and the SyGov enters. And the answer is that nothing much will change, because SDF forces will just be rebranded to being SyArmy forces; they're going to take off SDF patches and wear Syrian ones. As has happened a dozen times before.
[0] https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2017/03/syria-gree...
Let me present an alternative outcome: when the SyGov enters into joint-control of Northern Syria, nothing will change. And the bulk of the SDF will be incorporated into the Syrian military... exactly as the same as what has happened every single time this has happened in the last 8 years.
There is not a single reason to suspect otherwise, and propagandists like Hassan Hassan and co. will just find a new talking point next week.
It's actually ridiculous that the inner-circle of Twitter MENA propagandists, led by Henry Jackson Society notables like Michael Weiss, are still the go-to "experts" people depend on and still have a platform to spread their poison in 2019.
Sanctions starve people to death, literally. There is a blockade on food, medicine and your entire life savings turn to nothing. Your life becomes rations. It has such a significant effect that this even turned the non-religious Arab nationalist socialist Ba'ath party into an extremist Islamist brigade in under a decade[0].
These sanctions are even one the major stated reason of the 9/11 attacks by Al Qaeda[1] - not that Saudis flying planes into the world trade center somehow represents the suffering of Iraqis.
I'm not even sure why this would be contested, I don't think you understand what sanctions are or what kind of almost-genocidal effects they have[2] but with your comment I'm suddenly understanding the reasoning of the people downvoting me and upvoting others.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith_campaign
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motives_for_the_September_11_a...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctions_against_Iraq#Effects...
1. Terrorists are people with legitimate grievances
2. Terrorists are representatives of oppressed people
3. Terrorists have genuine reasons for their actions
All of these things are false. People do not turn into international, careless murderers just because they experience travesty. Terrorists exploit this concept to try to give themselves legitimacy, but the reality is that it's highly removed from the actual reality of what's happening.
You know what does create terrorists though?
1. Sanctions and
2. Funding of militias.
These are things that everyone - except for isolationists - stand behind and support.
----
Thanks for the 5 downvotes in 10 minutes! Feel free to help me (someone from the region who was directly caught up in not one but two American wars) understand why I should be a terrorist now. I'll also forward the comments to my cousin who was working inside a Red Cross clinic hit by a US airstrike so she also knows what to think. Thanks in advance HN!
Yes, he has.
This is his view as of Friday[0]:
> Many years ago I posted that I could not see anything wrong about sex between an adult and a child, if the child accepted it.
> Through personal conversations in recent years, I've learned to understand how sex with a child can harm per psychologically. This changed my mind about the matter: I think adults should not do that. I am grateful for the conversations that enabled me to understand why.
Can you help me understand what's wrong with that view?
[0] https://stallman.org/archives/2019-jul-oct.html#14_September...
Living in a country where the age of consent is 16, the oddest thing I find in all of this is that people can hold a straight face while saying that sleeping with a 17 year old constitutes pedophilia but seem to completely ignore that their country tries 13 year olds as adults[1] when they deem it fitting.
[0] https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFalla...
[1] https://oklahoman.com/article/5580060/13-year-old-boy-charge...
The line-up I mentioned was a photo line-up, where they place one of my mugshots among a group of other photoshopped mugshots.
They arrested me in the first instance, then released me, then arrested me again and charged me after they had performed the photo line-up.
It's not something I'm particularly proud of or something I talk about - outside of my immediate family no one really knows all of the details, and only a handful of people outside of my immediate family know about it. It's the most traumatic experience of my life and had significant consequences on my mental health that still affect me daily.
My blind optimism helped me through it, but it had really hurt my family too.
I fit the description: I was between 5'3" and 5'11" and my skin color can be described as "coffee with a touch of milk."
Video evidence that showed, fifteen minutes before it happened, that I was 13km away at a wedding having dinner wasn't enough since I could have left immediately after the footage was taken and driven down.
I still have video evidence of the senior detective basically instructing the witness to select me out of a lineup. They also whispered to each other throughout which I only managed to hear thanks to some expensive headphones I had.
I made fake Facebook accounts and befriended all of the "witnesses" and victims. Beat the case on a technicality thanks to a post I found on Facebook by a eye witness.
I'd still be in jail right now 9.5 years later.
I'd say it happens extremely frequently, it's just that the people it happens to aren't as lucky as I am.
In this case these aren't double shot, they are single shot that is painted/dyed and then has the lettering laser-etched out of the paint/dye.
I'll assume it's the former.
The reason why I'll assume it's the former is because we should always assume good faith - it's even a posting guideline on HN[0].
Perhaps it's not the fault of those poorer countries, but instead the fault of the Enlightened West (those that care about carbon emissions, democratic governance and human rights) illegally dumping their garbage onto other countries[3]?
There's something funny about Western governments illegally dumping thousands of tonnes of trash on the shores of poor countries[4] and then people having the audacity to support sanctions - literally punishing the civilians there by starving them through siege - for not having the ability to properly manage the waste.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctions_against_Iraq#Effects...
[1] https://www.dw.com/en/tired-of-being-trashed-philippines-rea...
[2] http://www.atchuup.com/countries-used-as-dumping-grounds-of-...
[3] https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-29/malaysia-to-send-tonn...
[4] http://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:6349/PiP_Report.pdf