And I understand why this behavior would be unwanted in production systems.
349 karma · joined December 21, 2009
Currently exploring functional programming and dependent type systems
Also working in small software company in Belgrade
my_nickname at gmail
And I understand why this behavior would be unwanted in production systems.
(a,b)+(c,d) = (a+c,b+d)
(a,b)/sqrt(5) = (b,a/5)
(a,b)(c,d) = (ac+5bd,ad+bc)
2phi = (1,1)
F(n) = (2phi^n - (2-2phi)^n)/(2^n*sqrt(5))
[edit] As ot said, the right word is "extended"
Any idea to where is this coming from? Any related articles?
I really don't see any reason for their usage here, except of their resemblance to the shape of the sun (and analog clock).
Majority of people plays safe. There is nothing wrong in that. If someone can show them better choice, not by talking, but by creating better private school for underprivileged kids, they will start sending their kids in such schools.
When some percentage of people accepts that there are more options, I believe that more intelligent debate will emerge.
two PhDs for Haskell
This presentation is so lighthearted... I realy like it.
I don't see why this is global...
I began having difficulty finding people to discuss ideas and thoughts with. When I did find someone who I could brainstorm and bounce ideas off of it was a very surreal feeling. I loved every minute of it and did not want to stop. Even today I have very few of these conversations but cherish the people I can have these conversations with. I enjoy my ideas being challenged. I enjoy being challenged, period. My level of excitement in these conversations are off the hook.
:)
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2010-November/...
(joke)
My combination is just kj.
BSD history is repeating itself...
http://johnstamosfever.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/ninjas-an...
Best lecture EVER.
Why would professors need to make same lectures every year? It make more sense to make new lectures only when they have something new or better to say.
Are mainframes COBOL standard compliant?
Is there free standard document?
"Who are you?"
"The new number two."
"Who is number one?"
"You are number six."
"I am not a number, I am a free man."
"HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA."
Btw, why not use encoded pictures?
It is really nice letter indeed.
I have posted this because of comments. Good part of them agree with your statement.
"One of the best leaps a programmer makes during their path from newb to godhood is to realize that 'objects' don't map well to real world objects. Programs work better, designs are more clean... code sucks less when a object in code represents the embodiment of a singular concept; a singular set of invariants rather than an object. Is that a failing of language design? A quirk of calling it object oriented programming rather than state oriented programming?"
http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/3265#comment-48034
(worth reading, not particularly related with your statement)
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Write_Yourself_a_Scheme_in_48_H...
Also, there you can download PDF.