665 karma · joined March 6, 2010
If founders have all the stress of low salary + not much savings + lots of work to do + maybe starting a family, of course a $10M exit starts to look good.
But if they're achieving good results, why not give the founders a small taste of the billion dollar carrot?
Executive compensation is not included in SR&ED. Even if you're a CEO who codes, only the time you spend coding can be claimed. The salary claimable is capped at $100K (I believe) for any major shareholders (or family members).
It is also well established that whoever owns the IP gets the SR&ED credits and foreign companies are not eligible for SR&ED.
4. Fab
They may well attend, but at this point the article only indicates that Google/Facebook have been invited.
Apparently it was 200M, not 60M. I have to stick to my original hypothesis, Polyvore is more valuable than some realize.
Deep learning is a form of representation/feature learning.
http://www.meimin.us/bencandy.php?fid=27&id=265577&city_id=3
I wonder if the $10 isn't per hour, rather than per day.
-a reverse proxy -service to scrape various business records, helping journalists analyzing records -anti-phishing tool (browser plugin?) that verifies you're not putting your (Google) password into a wrong site.
To have 2 servers with the same IP, we use VRRP (Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol) and keepalived. HAProxy is setup on 2 separate servers/instances, and using VRRP/keepalive they both share an IP address (which HAProxy binds to). The servers also have their own unique IP address(es) (on top of the shared one), so the shared address doesn't really "belong" to any machine.
If one server goes down, VRRP gives the IP to the other server and that HAProxy takes over.
The language in the article is a bit zealous - Microsoft did well, but didn't "win" any challenge in Imagenet. VGG and Google seem to be the ones people are really watching / emulating.
It's similar to what an engine like TinEye does, but instead of using a bunch of SIFT/SURF/etc features to do numerous visual word lookups, you'd just put in (a modified?) phash and get one word out.
Pinterest. Groupon. Reddit. Snapchat. Instagram. Youtube (for many years). Twitter took a long time to make money. Most news sites have a hard time, which is why WSJ is paywalled (as mentioned in the article). On the "smaller valuation side", we could say FriendFeed, Zite, Hot Potato, Beluga, GroupMe, TweetDeck, Dodgeball.
It's much harder to than you may realize to monetize.
There are various new articles about the Tokyo Metropolitan Police and Mt.gox "working together", but it sounds like you are right that the police are not investigating Karpeles.
Either a) the author knew this and didn't think such a major policy shift was worth addressing or b) was ignorant.
This is what I mean - the article was poorly written / researched. China has many problems, the article doesn't have any substance. It's divisive, and inaccurate in several key "facts".
"China’s demography is a disaster ... by 2050, China will have lost one-third of its working-age population"
Grandiose hyperbole substantiated by the fact that in 35 years, people will be older!
"China’s politics are wrong"
"jobs will come home to the U.S...(due to) plentiful cheap energy from fracking"
No need to pander.