Cheating in Fortnite is practically unheard of at this point. But it won't be long until the player base is just as jaded as PUBG's: https://github.com/Griizz/Fortnite-Hack
586 karma · joined May 9, 2014
Cheating in Fortnite is practically unheard of at this point. But it won't be long until the player base is just as jaded as PUBG's: https://github.com/Griizz/Fortnite-Hack
"Link to this post in three years and ponder in its prescients... Web 3.0 will be born in the death of the heavily botted social networks."
> Top comment, find a better job
> Every time
"Someone who wants to own a % of a real estate asset in this city could just buy a % share of mine.
Smart contracts via crypto make this super doable."
While Bitcoin doesn't share the same set of problems as fiat currency, it has its own burdens, and has proven completely ineffective as a functional money system outside of speculation and fraud. The novelty of Bitcoin is supposedly its 'immutable ledger', a phrase used so frequently in defending Bitcoin, that it has become divorced from its meaning, and divorced from the reality that solutions to distributed logging existed long before Bitcoin, and many more solutions to this problem will be developed with no regard to the blockchain.
Bitcoin itself will never replace anything -- cryptocurrencies will remain monolithic in purpose and function for a very long time. The underlying ideas to the Bitcoin protocol will be iterated on, and we'll see these ideas implemented in distributed software, but to incessantly hype Bitcoin as the singular platform for cryptocurrency is to live in a bubble.
pls buy litecoin
Googling around, there doesn't seem to be an equivalent map out there for AAVE.
> They asked 114 undergraduate female students to watch a video and imagine themselves as bystanders to a situation where a man made either a sexist catcall remark (“Hey Kelly, your boobs look great in that shirt!”) at another woman or simply greeted her (“Hey Kelly, what’s up?”).
Maybe you could provide a citation instead for this?
> the senseless repetition of long-debunked stereotypical nonsense.
Do you really believe that? Because from the outside, it seems that the only people talking about "blockchain technology" are those who have a significant amount of money invested in it.
This article is a blockchain banking service saying, "hey, other people should use this solve-all technology that is definitely the future too!"
Maybe instead of asking this, we should ask the cryptocurrency enthusiasts what area of technology won't be dropped-and-replaced by blockchains, because so far it seems apparently applicable to every single use case in every single industry... By the way, did you guys hear this thing is an immutable ledger?
> You chose to grow with venture capital and you’ve no doubt (I hope) taken some money off the table in your Series C round. I say this because this new version of digg reeks of VC meddling. It’s cobbling together features from more popular sites and departing from the core of digg, which was to “give the power back to the people.”
Altspace was doomed the moment they decided to fundraise instead of, you know, make money. There was no reason Altspace couldn't have been made by 1-2 people. Instead, they went on a hiring spree, and the game had nothing to show for it. Really, anyone funding the VR space right now is insane: http://vrlfg.net/
Your link is not evidence of "strange convolution." The reason there are so many steps/screenshots is because the payment service is in Russian, and the guide is designed for non-Russian speakers.
Most people never dealt with fiat on BTC-e, and would use someone like Coinbase to fund the purchase of coins, and trade exclusively in crypto on BTC-e.
> Now the top 12 or so volume-ranked Bitcoin exchanges listed at https://cryptowat.ch are perfectly legitimate trustworthy companies.
BTC-e was number six on that list...
Do you really think a reddit/aggregator where you pay-per-upvote (via a subscription service, instead of fiverr like a normal person) is going to encourage long form articles?
I don't think I would pay to be part of a pseudo-oligarchy, but I would pay for an aggregator that couldn't be gamed by bot accounts. This... almost does that.
...Or are you just being reductive and showing off your programming knowledge?
> Contract applications in need of blockchain immutability can store and retrieve data on the Etheruem blockchain
> A new kind of cryptocurrency based on tokenized quantum signatures to use as payment for service offered on the platform.
> Build contract apps that can scale easily. Launch multiple instances and share tasks between them.
And I still can't think of a single use case. Also there's a spelling mistake in the first sentence of the white paper.