stuckinhell

wow very impressive

Business's are finding out neural network AI's just need to be more trustworthy than people.

Which some already are.

To reply to many criticisms of the intern replacement:

With the successful results of our AI experiments in not only both coding, but also business reports. We don't see a need to hire nearly as many interns, or even need to hire more developers for the immediate future.

It's already changed our operations, the only problem right now is making sure the ai "brain" stays frozen, which I think llama 3.1 405B or something similar would solve ideally ? Though its also not clear if GPT-5/6 is so good, it doesn't matter.

The only thing we've noticed, is that you can't train people to use the AI effectively, driven senior devs and technical domain experts figure out how to optimize their own workflows very effectively. We've simply given them access to Enterprise ChatGPT, and given them the ability to create private actions to our internal api's. The scale is here is interesting, because it doesn't scale out to allow us to hire and train more people easily, instead it allows a solo dev/technical analyst to go 100x.

It seems like it's fundamentally different. I've seen 4 different senior engineers use the AI drastically differently to improve the way they write code and think about problems.

The AI is probably right.

Being serious now, its clear the neural network AI's are incredible and amazing for technical users, but not nearly ready for generalized or uneducated users (or I guess journalists).

Do they need to be 100% error free before the general public can accept them and use them ? For me, it's already replaced the work I'd send to interns and I get BETTER results than those interns. So it's already a huge win. My team has already seen a programming improvement of 40% in speed, and less buggy code.

So is the benefits of the AI revolution really going to be captured by the ultra technical domain experts ?

100% reddit is full of people trying to solder more vram

It seems interesting, but for complex ui's it's seems almost nitemarish

The studies showing red meat is actually good for you, kinda make me believe this. My health has also dramatically improved after eating more red meat and less low fat vegetarian options, but I'm a sample size of 1. My personal lived experience about what actually worked for me, really makes me question more things.

everything really. just opus so far

I'm honestly shocked people are saying this. I use both and GPT-4 is usually better.

What kind of coding tasks is Claude 3 opus doing for people ?

I've had way better success with GPT-4o than claude. I wonder why

Perhaps a fake economy ?

Wow, lord of the flies was a big lie then.

That is a bold statement. I'm 100 convinced that it's based on your code architecture.

Good code in my systems are ones that don't need to be touched or read very often, and the fluid/unknowns parts are decoupled elsewhere. Sometimes business requirements issue, Sometimes difficult technical problem.

"When AI is used properly" is a very very loaded statement. Especially since evidence shows code is one of the worst things its good at, it' a lot better at other tasks.

It's distasteful to push stuff like after all the men who died on D-day.

I agree with you.

No fine tuning seems pointless right now. you can't even fine tune the frontier models.

Can't we just AI driven techniques to help optimize and reduce resource usage.

I think we are all ready seeing good results. I'm super interested in the next gen chips as well.

https://stability.ai/news/stability-ai-sdxl-turbo

https://www.marktechpost.com/2023/01/05/deepminds-latest-ai-...

hmm I'm having a hard time thinking AI is going away. It feels like pandora's box has opened a bit. So I guess should invest in energy companies ?

our "children" the AI

I can't agree anymore. After trying out udio.com my mind is completely blown at what I thought was possible.

Extremely unethical behavior by the New York Times if true

It seems like the problem is woke/dei. Don't piss on my leg, and tell me its raining. Occams razor.

All while Taylor Swift is taking 30 min private jet trips.

The New York Times is dying company that is rent seeking here. Along time ago, their content was valuable, yet now you can't even give it away to researchers.

I know because they tried to make a deal with my company, we passed because social media data is infinitely more valuable.

extremely disturbing

Nothing stopping individuals from training on their own hardware either. HuggingFace Ceo's just said open source gpt4 level models coming this year.

I doubt this once Bloomberg, Netflix, and Hollywood fully jump abroad the AI train.

They'll probably just lobby to change the laws, seeing this happen already.

Push notifications allow more people to spy on you.

At the core most technologies have been deeply rooted by intelligence agencies.