1,765 karma · joined March 26, 2025
Maybe try Claude Code one day, then you'll recognise what that phrase was actually about.
All the best! You must need it with such attitude to life.
And yeah, it'll be Motorola from the next year on, but a proper, first party cooperation. I think that Motorola wants to become the answer to the question: "what's the best, safest android smartphone?"
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=gr.nikolasspyr...
(FWIW, sometimes when you _block_ the app from the Play Integrity API (in this pop-up) the app that wants to perform the check works, while it fails when you do not block it)
OK, explain, what to the "just use Claude code" means in your opinion.
From your words it's literally using the coding harness to access Google Photos and fopy/backup these photos/videos, still within the Claude code.
Is this what you'd do? Because that's the only way I'd understand someone to go on such rant.
You're not authorising CC to access your photos.
Claude Code is used to prepare the rclone run.
What do you mean that by using cc you're handing over your data (presumably synced photos) you're handing over your data"?
Take care!
Best of both worlds.
It wouldn't be advised to buy the latest pixel now anyway, either get the previous one or wait a few months for Motorola Signature 27, where GrapheneOS will be first party OS, and not hated-by-the-vendor bolt-on.
If you insist on the latest pixel, go check the GrapheneOS discussion forum for all the details.
Docker is much more than memorising a handful of Dockerfile directives.
Ill take a look at the game, thank you!
I've been in several and they actually feel okay to live in, to run errands, to shop.
It only sounds funny if it's cranked up to the extreme -- like abusive housing associations, a cancer growing on the corpse of the old communities which just wanted some quiet evenings and the bins to not be overflowing, but it can be done well.
All these examples have been widely reported nationwide, some worldwide. No need to even dig through the local reporting.
Are you saying there have been no cases when the "routine" traffic stop resulted in the cop killing an unarmed civilian still sitting in the car?
Or maybe that roadside "drug testers" are solid so when the untrained rookie uses a tiny piece of glazing to "check for drugs", the use is according to the manual and thus gives no false positives? John Oliver has a very good video on that.
Cops are no-ones friend and the multiple examples from the bodycams proved exactly that.
Deletion of the account should be as simple as overwriting a row on a few tables. If they can handle authentication process, disable accounts based on some automated processes, deletion or the process equivalent to it is similarly possible.
Even in case of backups it can easily be done (delete decryption key for this user's row, if you planned your backups right), but even if it isn't (historical backups for example), even the regulator will agree it's fine (BT, dt).
Cops are definitely not my friend, I fully expect them to lie, fabricate "evidence" and look for any excuse to cause problems, and it's all on them.
That was almost everything I needed, I didn't even have UK driving licence at the time.
I'm very aware there are many dark issues as well, but you asked why.
Oh, you asked why _obsessed_? You don't really think everyone thinking Japan is an attractive country is automatically obsessed with it?
It's less hidden since the Brexit campaign encouraged the xenophobia on the streets, TV, papers, even one of the past PMs was famously racist and xenophobic and it flew without any issue.
Japan is not the only one.
I did read all the comments in this branch and I disagreed with the way you put something.
You didn't "defend" the dev stance but you called someone considering a fork due to the unwanted features "threatening the dev", probably due to the fact it's a negative outcome to them, but somehow you are okay with the dev making the arbitrary decisions that are negatively impacting some users.
You cannot have both. They're either allowed to walk away branching out, or he's not allowed to make "threats" to them.
And you cannot pretend you're engaging with my arguments in the good faith while ignoring clou of my comment and calling it "knee-jerk response" instead, LOL.
Why do you support for the arbitrary number (20%) of the brutal, illegal occupiers involved in the countless, documented human right abuses and murders to remain on the land they stole and have absolutely no right to occupy?
A decade ago a bank account, passport and bill with your home address was all that was needed to work legally.
(But I'd concede that in the field of genocide China doesn't come up as bad)
The way I read your response is "you must buy my X, otherwise you're negatively impacting me already" and it's something turned on its head.