sudodevnull

I really like the ideas of hmx I just didn't find the actual implementation was complete enough to make performant apps... So I fixed it

Sure, go try doing it and see what happens. Make sure to handle every verb, automatically connect, expo backoff, etc!

Datastar author here, all this happened while I was asleep so yeah I'm really good at reading the system in my dreams. I must be actually AGI and totally not a real person. Highly suspect

Read the grugs around the fire essay on the datastar site

That's kind of the point. Don't throw out the new modern features of the browser but use them with fine-grainer activity. Otherwise most of the state lives in the back end. It's really just getting back to normalcy

Servers sending HTML to the browser? Scandalous!

We didn't remove the features, if you want to use the old ones they're still there in the repo. We just didn't want to support the old way of doing them when we actively tell people not to use them. If you're going to be a support burden going forward we want you to have skin in the game if not cool do it yourself no one's going to get mad at you

Technically very different but emotionally yes very the same but a lot simpler

Yes look at the active issues on GitHub. There's hundreds and some going back years with no traction.

That doesn't work. My day job is at scenario working on NATS and I can tell you 99.9% of people don't pay for support

[flagged]

Cool how do exponential back off, make sure that it auto connects on tab visibility changes, make sure when you replace stuff it keeps the same selection. I'm sure if you had enough of these you'll end up with 10 kilobyte shim

We have tons of people using TSX in deno or bun. You are just creating it primarily in the back end.

Datastar is spec compliant HTML. Please point me to the code that's not HTML spec compliant

We are limited to what is possible in the data dash-* spec. If you have better syntax that's going to work everywhere in every browser please let us know!

And gomponents is great!

Datastar author here. Yes nothing is new here, that's kind of the point. You seemingly lost her way with jQuery which was just sprinkle on the page but then spa wasn't interesting approach at reactivity while missing all the points of the back end controlling most the state. I'm not trying to be innovative I'm just trying to get us back to some normalcy

Not in the slightest

Data star is a backend agnostic backend framework that happens to have a 10kb on the frontend. You should probably read the guy before coming to conclusions on what it is

Datastar author here, neat idea. Join the Discord and talk to us about how to implement. We're just a few guys and just don't have the cycles to explore every option for every facet of the project. Some of this is pure overhead

Author of Datastar here. Most people don't need pro and it seems like putting it on the front page is actually marketing it instead of people finding it as the need the features. Not only should most people not use the features we actively push against it. The only thing that's really super valuable is the inspector which is a Dev tool

Why? What is at stake?

Why is pro pertinent info? You probably don't need it. It's just a set of plugins and tools anyone could write if they needed.

Then don't buy it, you probably need it

It's not a joke, there is only one Datastar CEO. Identity theft is not a joke Jim

But it's more than a checkbox, it has color and can be any element, not just checkboxes

USES DATASTAR, SMASH THAT LIKE AND SUBSCRIBE!!!!! Better?

Not right now. CSP in a Datastar context is mostly a red herring. If an enterprise wants it to check a box then please reach out.

Use whatever backend language you want. No justification needed when it's agnostic, even, shocker, JS

You're right! 200-400% faster is so useless.