sumedh

> and the board tries to fix that

The board didnt have the maturity to fix that.

> Their models aren't the best

the market has spoken, for coding they are the best.

Why are you not leaving right now?

If I am not mistaken he had predicted that IBM will go bankrupt, did that prediction come true?

> cementing the thesis of Geoffrey Hinton's

Didnt he say there wont be any need for radiologists?

> doesn't mean you get to discount the one business units products to the other

That depends, if all developers get used to Claude and Codex it will become harder for Google to attract them in the future.

They might lose devs in the long term.

What part is confusing?

They are just copying features from Claude Code.

OpenAi wants non devs to start coding as well, its just going to confuse users when there are two Apps.

Google might shut it down soon.

> But it’s ok to be voluntarily grateful for hard work.

You don't become a billionaire using that approach though.

Which AI are you using?

> You understand this after you start using it.

Its just amazing people that people talk about Anthropic and have never used it.

So Google allowed publishing the Attention paper because they didn't understand its value.

> including the option to acquire Anthropic.

I have feeling that Dario is not the type of man who would want to be acquired and then have Google's CEO telling him what to do.

Anthropic seems to be doing fine :)

Why pay for two subscriptions though?

Claude also has other models which use less tokens.

People are using them for creating marketing material for their business.

Why not?

Earlier you needed expert Photoshop skills to create fake images now anyone can do it.

Isn't their argument that third party harness dont play nice with their GPUs which is a fair argument.

With Claude Code they can predict what the traffic would look like with third party harness they cannot.

Have you used Windows?

Isnt Mollie Europe only?

GPT 5.4 in Codex is good enough now.

Try it.

What will happen if they don't because the founders control the voting powe

Your link shows there have been huge drops.

How is it fine?

> At that point you are beholden to your shareholders

No not really, you can issue two types of shares, the company founders can control a type of shares which has more voting power while other shareholders can get a different type of shares with less voting power.

Facebook, Google has something similar.

What was your startup?

> find LLMs alone are really slow for this task

Faster LLMs will be here by next year.

> I'll leave the moment another model works for me as well as Claude does.

Isnt that a large moat in itself but you are claiming its not enough?

> Humans won't be a multi planetary species.

Mars is a different planet. We are talking about Mars not a planet thousands of years away.

> Yep, you said it: it's a big PR stunt.

I didn't say that, you did. My point is humans connect with other humans not rovers.