There was a time many ages ago when the word "hacker" was reserved only for the most dangerous and reckless breed of computer programmers.
10 karma · joined February 4, 2019
(I use Arch, btw)
There was a time many ages ago when the word "hacker" was reserved only for the most dangerous and reckless breed of computer programmers.
Unfortunately, a circulatory system is practically impossible to replace. It would cost tens of millions of dollars and you'd have to already be in great shape to survive the very long recovery time. And then you do all this, only to die eventually, all the same.
Hackers do create things. Sometimes malicious things and sometimes things that offer no real benefit to society, but things all the same. In this definition you have to take the good with the bad.
Some people here make money through cool silicon valley startups that make for great success porn but don't forget that some people here also make money doing shady or even downright illegal things.
What we have in common in this community is our technology interests, not our morals or values. If you accept this fact, you can open your mind up to some great content and conversations.
It's the difference between having a large index fund, and having a portfolio of 5-10 good companies.
Basically it's like they're not even trying to filter much anymore.
As we wrap up the 2010s, I feel that a lot of the entrepreneurial wave in this decade was catalyzed by the founding of mobile app stores, the network effects of expanding social medias and cloud services making software deployments easier than ever.
Incubators seemed well poised to help this flood of new entrepreneurs navigate the changing landscapes and get exposure to investors, but by now people have become more savvy and this is mostly a solved problem.
Investors are also well aware by now that incubators do not magically produce unicorns or even great companies, and are looking for better returns elsewhere. Demo Days are mostly a lazy way to sit and listen to a bunch of pitches without really giving a fuck. I know at one demo day a couple of investors spent most of their time talking in the hallway while founders pitched on. Investors know all your tricks to make your company seem more appetizing: fake appointments in your calendars, strategically chosen metrics, name dropping, paper trails, etc...
I also think that pretty much any photo is going to look more intense that what anyone can see in real life. Look at the main photo in the article. The lights are so bright that the ground is illuminated green. Really? I doubt the lights can be such a strong light source. They are also very sharply defined as a result of the longer exposure, a human would probably see something blurrier and more ethereal.
I could perhaps believe that under the right conditions and dark adaption a human could see the lights a bit more colorful instead of just white, but I don't see how the sky could dance with clear and crisp ribbons of green and purple for miles unless the solar activity was so strong all our electronic hardware was being fried. (A long time ago there was an event so strong the lights could be seen all the way down near the equator, luckily before we had computers)
OK I'm going to stop this right here.
The Northern Lights do not dazzle you with the incredible green light displays you see in pictures. In real life, you might not even realize you are looking at a Northern Light unless you know what to look for.
The only way the lights appear so vivid is by taking a photo of them with a camera with a long enough exposure. When I saw the Northern Lights I had mistaken them for bright clouds illuminated by the moonlight. Only when I took a photo with my iPhone did I realize they were the Northern Lights.
The fact that I was not made aware of this until I arrived at my final destination after a journey of thousands of miles across the world has made me bitter about it.
With such an inaccuracy on the very first line of this article, I can't bring myself to continue.
If you want to make pretty little apps that get you tons of likes on Dribbble or whatever, go make consumer apps.
When it comes to enterprise apps boring is beautiful. I'm talking dense data displays, esoteric shortcuts, NO optimistic saving behaviors, etc. Everything that classical consumer app designers hate. The point of an enterprise app is all business.
There will be another market crash, it’s not a big deal it happens every so often and life moves on.
If there is a war, the size and strength of the US Military virtually guarantees we will win.
It’s not so bad. Nothing can touch us.
Not that either one was really all that necessary in the first place anyway.
Once a SPA is loaded you can send tiny crumbs of data faster than any significant SSR.
I have a T480s, fully maxed out specs except no dedicated GPU (this will give you dual heat pipes instead for better thermal performance on an i7 core). 24GB RAM. Keyboard is incredible compared to Macbook. I recommend non-backlit version for better textures on the keys. Case itself is military spec compliant and probably stronger than Macbook unibody. Hard drive is a terabyte NVME ssd, and I added a Toshiba RC100 480gb NVME ssd into the WWAN slot (runs at 1x performance though, but still good). I upgraded the wifi card to the latest intel 9260 so I can achieve gigabit Wifi speeds at work, an easy swap. I run linux distros and windows in dual boot depending on work requirements.
Thinkpad laptops can also open ALL the way flat which has actually come in handy a few times. You won't know though until you experience it yourself.