HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

suppressingfire

30 karma · joined June 23, 2010

submissionscomments
suppressingfire··on Microsoft employee on stack ranking and its 'most universally hated exec'
IBM - 433,362
suppressingfire··on GetACoder.com: Solve P Vs NP
But the getacoder poster only specified that it had to be done in polynomial time, and didn't clarify whether that had to be total CPU time (i.e., "work") or wall clock time.

Given that underspecification, it's perfectly justifiable to use an exponential amount of resources to achieve the goal.

suppressingfire··on GetACoder.com: Solve P Vs NP
Depends on the problem and how you distribute data.

e.g., each node can generate its own subset to check, so you only need to distribute the program and input. That can be done using a multicast tree of some kind which brings distribution costs back down by a log.

suppressingfire··on GetACoder.com: Solve P Vs NP
As a re-representation of the DNA computing work cited above, you can actually do exponential work in poly time using a photocopier.

EDIT: here's a link to a paper describing this approach: http://www.springerlink.com/content/j5213p8761224304/

suppressingfire··on GetACoder.com: Solve P Vs NP
Whoa... I never thought I'd see my dad's work reffed on HN.
suppressingfire··on GetACoder.com: Solve P Vs NP
Since the post only specified polynomial time and placed no constraint on space, this is actually solvable (e.g., it's not too hard to come up with an polynomial implementation that uses a number of VMs that grows exponentially with the size of the set).
suppressingfire··on Google Reader reader? Would you find this service useful?
Right, and then bring together all those related posts, so I have the links to both the reddit comments and the HN comments in the same context as the original article link.
suppressingfire··on Re: yesterday's "Why I'm not hiring" WSJ op-ed and why it was poop
What if they're wrong based on what they said AND who they are?
suppressingfire··on Ask HN: What's going on at google?
I've seen the same issue intermittently with gmail and calendar under Firefox 3.6, even though I'm properly logged in to iGoogle and reader...
← PreviousPage 2 of 2