either their fraud-detection isn't working, or they're turning blind-eye here for profit?
117 karma · joined August 22, 2025
either their fraud-detection isn't working, or they're turning blind-eye here for profit?
yeah but aws advertises as "trust me bro I won't go down for 99.99999%"
I've seen a lot of gov proposals using aws to 'get away with downtime management'
"LLM-level world-detail knowledge"
"does the numbers add up?"
this article is about NUMBERS regarding return-on-investment / etc
"useful" is so vague so it's too 'useless' to the discussion here... I'm not sure why everyone here is parrotting that like gpt hallucination
of course, it's better than "this is so crap no one would buy it" -- but for investors, they want to know: "if I put X dollars now, would I get 10*X dollars or 1/10 X dollars?"
it's weird that all these comments on "usefulness" doesn't even attempt to explain whether the numbers add up ok or not
hmm maybe that "would benefit" is a bit too vague?
babies are already born with "the model of the world"
but a lot of experiments on babies/young kids tell otherwise
macbook air + multitouch + apple pen
(but for other uses - nope)
the "engineering means working with engines" gibberish at the bottom is simply dishonest at best
"engineering" means "it's not guessing game"
maybe we started calling it "engineering" after we had some rules & calculations to make it "not-guessing-game"?
it's not to blame those workers, but re-think about the job itself
with leaf blowing, where do people blow their leaves/branches/trash to? to roads? to neighbors? making roads flood by blocking road drainage?
what about all these noise and dust from leaf-blowing? (even not counting all those fuel burning...)
maybe those leaf-blowing promoters are the "arseholes" ?
just rake them, put them in big bags & compost them
this isn't some low-skill burger-flipping workers staying permanently and replacing a whole career of american citizens' jobs...
US just had to turn a blind-eye, wait until those workers are done with the set-up and leave for good
And now... things got ugly too quick -- I doubt even Trump wanted this.
My pet theory is... this is a classic example of an political double-spy (Tori Branum) being "cooperatively passive-aggressive" (if party a shouts for A, get inside party a, and go to the extreme far-end of A to show A is bad -- though in reality, some middle-ground was what party a was initially aiming for)
I mean, prior to this, just a small possibility of being sent to the US was a big perk (job descriptions often highlighted this in bold fonts) Hence, companies would rotate people to hush complaints ("that guy gets to go to the US more than me!")
now... if being sent could mean "you could be banned from entering/working in US", it's a big no-no
Anyway, this will mean extra costs + less competitive people going to the USA (they should be forced to go, so... it'll probably be people with career dead-ends, whom americans might not want to 'learn from'...)
the only fix to the issue: officially commit huuuuge working visa quota for s.koreans...
ok... of course you can easily apply.
But then, when do you get the approval? next day? next week? next month? year?
this is just a big example of US not being "institutionally ready" for Trump's "Made in America" vision.
(what's "medium-size corp" and how did you come up with $100k ?)