3,333 karma · joined November 21, 2018
https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/10407
> To be very honest here, you risk having KeePassXC blocked by relying parties
But having a choice about how you store your credentials shouldn't depend on the good faith of service providers or the spec authors who are doing their bidding anyway. It's a bit similar to sideloading apps, and it should probably be treated similarly (ie, make it a right for users).
I understand the value of attestations in a corporate environment when you want to lock down your employees' devices. But that could simply have been handled through a separate standard for that use case.
Maybe a bit early to declare that, as the wave of college closures has shown no signs of slowing after the Covid years [0] and is expected to accelerate further [1]?
[0] https://www.2adays.com/blog/college-shutdown-surge-update-th...
[1] https://www.fastcompany.com/91245055/higher-education-crisis...
[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottlob_Frege#Political_view...
Probabilities aren't a matter of faith, they're mathematics and as such represent a logical trueism. Your critiques are just nitpicking for the sake of it and void of substance. Have a coffee and leave this topic.
Maybe in your bubble, but globally this is just false.
To give some positive feedback: I like your loan calculator. That's something that could really be useful for a lot of people. I think there's still more you can do there, eg let people figure out how much credit they can afford with a given monthly payment. Take a look at traditional financial calculators like the HP 12c, they're extremely versatile in that regard.
Personally, I don't see the need for separate calculators for things like percentage increase or rounding numbers. Most of those could be combined in 2-3 apps at most, imho, scientific, financial and unit conversion. The others are really separate apps that would need a lot more functionality than the pure calculation aspect to really be useful (eg time tracking).
One example: Ireland's GDP grew a staggering 25% in 2015 [0], mainly because Apple decided to book more of their profits there. It does lead to higher tax revenue, but creates relatively few jobs or other income there. The profits go to Apple shareholders, who mainly live outside Ireland. Household income would more adequately reflect where those benefits go than GDP.
Plus, with household income it's more natural to look at the median in addition to the mean, which is the more robust metric, statistically speaking.
[0] https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locat...
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2837639
Discussed on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12478847
Who would have thought that they'd turn that research into algorithms that skim off surplus (from consumers and drivers)?
[0] Consumer surplus: roughly, the benefit of all those consumers who got a lower price than what they would have been willing to pay. Especially prevalent when there's one price for all. So the natural enemy of consumer surplus is price discrimination, where suppliers try to extract close to the maximum amount they're willing to pay from each consumer.
> “Yes,” I replied, not bothering to correct the “physicist” part.
Didn't read much beyond that part. He'll fit right in with the rationalist crowd...
It seems that you are oddly unfamiliar with the German apprenticeship system, for a German. Nothing illegal here: https://www.sparkasse.de/karriere/schueler-und-schulabgaenge...
It would be interesting if the researchers could clarify this before people start rolling their own solutions.