1,066 karma · joined February 7, 2012
I mean, if this is a "great Thai restaurant in my neighborhood", how likely is it he ordered there yesterday for the first time?
Or the other way round, have some AI colorize the older pictures.
[1] https://twitter.com/TwitterDev/status/1615405842735714304?cx...
[2] https://developer.twitter.com/en/developer-terms/agreement
Shouldn't this also have 'Thunderbolt' as an option? Maybe it's because I am still confused about the topic, but the port has the Thunderbolt 'lightning bolt' symbol next to it. Even if the three options given are technically sufficient, I feel that confused consumers like me would benefit from an additional 'Thunderbolt' option.
For the latter case, classic project management simply leads to failure and it needs iterative development with tight feedback loops.
So if you want to give used Cybikos a try, you should be willing to deal with this.
[1] https://hozi.net/it/computer-historie/vobis-highscreen-colan... [2] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Colani-pc.jpg
IIRC, he presented a prototype that was much more radical, and a lot got lost in mass production. In the end it was a standard case with a few rounded edges.
How is this achieved?
Anything you do to alleviate or prevent boredom that is not creative can be said to 'prevent reaping creative rewards' of boredom. Not just social media (or any media consumption, really) but also sports or calling a friend or helping in a soup kitchen. If you didn't do it, you'd feel boredom, and might pick up something creative instead.
I think this is really the crux of the issue: That there are these quasi-monopolies for certain online services.
What's possible in crowd funding comes down to what Kickstarter does. Expected behavior of a search engine is what Google does. The standards of an online dictionary look like what Wikipedia does. And what microblogging looks like is now determined by Elon.
If in each area there was a small ecosystem of, say, three to five different players, they could each find their niche, competing on something like leniency towards such projects like Unstable Diffusion, or on how to interpret free speech etc and the users could choose the service that suits their own standards.
But since for many popular online services there is effectively a single go-to site, this one site gets to set the rules that everyone has to play by.
So how do we get more variety? I don't know. It seems to be inherent in how this market of online services works that there's always one who ends up with 99% market share.
Anything that can be done on semi-auto mode, so that it captures the remaining attention that is left when focusing on something else, so that the mind doesn't wander but is fully captivated.
[1] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/func...