te

Where can I view recorded or real-time matches by existing bots? Where's the leaderboard?

Splice you parent file at the time stamps, interleave the samples, then concat.

At the risk of not being helpful: I have some json files that are updated weekly that I keep under source control in git. The week-to-week updates are often fairly simple, but git was showing some crazy diffs that I knew were way more complicated than the update. I soon realized that the data provider was not consistently sorting the json arrays; when I began sorting the json arrays by rowid everytime before writing it, the diff's were as straightforward as expected. I think I don't understand the problem you're encountering, because this solution seems too obvious.

I recommend RockBox on a Sandisk Sansa Clip+. Goes to 11 on brilliance.

> the freeloader will get fired while you get promoted.

Lol, if only.

You can guesstimate the average service life of a car using Little's Law: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little%27s_law

Share of new cars was 6.9% in 2019, ~5.0% in 2020, and scrappage rate was 5.1% in 2019 (source: https://news.ihsmarkit.com/prviewer/release_only/slug/bizwir...).

If the average in/out flow per year is ~5%, average life is 20 years. If 6%, ~17 years.

"You can't go back and change the beginning, but you can start where you are and change the ending.” — C S Lewis

Nim or Julia?

We had an Apple II+ with the limitations you describe. However, we purchased and installed the 80-column card that provided both 80-columns and lowercase characters, which is what I think the parent comment is suggesting.

Who is the manufacturer? I don't think I've ever seen a non-grid jigsaw puzzle before.

HTML. Say, a blog post. Or a technical document. Instead of comment threads at the bottom, I imagine the comments inserted/attached inline in the text, perhaps only visible with mouse hover or appearing in a sidebar.

I'm seeking a library that enables inline comments and annotations within a document. Can anyone recommend something?

What is the (spiritual) successor of DYNAMO? Would Modelica be a fit?

Sorry, who is Calvin? Can't find any reference.

You might like Gaming the Vote by William Poundstone.

I'd probably look at this one as well: https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.04339

Nice job, I really like this and find it useful. A couple ideas I'd love to see implemented, depending on how far you want to go with this:

(1) On the "top 5 traded tickers" display, just go ahead and list all the tickers and not just top 5. This will summarize the day-by-day info on the left panel. Would be nice to sort the traded tickers summary by either count or ticker.

(2) So right now, we can select a date and see the reports from Senators that reported that day. Additionally, I'd like to name a Senator and see all their trades across all reports in a single screen. Finally, I'd like to click (or input) a ticker and see all reported trades for a given ticker among all Senators and all dates.

Thanks again. I wasn't even aware this info was now publicly reported. A small step forward, I guess.

I was put off by the title of this book, but after reviewing the Table of Contents, I'm quite intrigued and I'll be picking up a copy. Thanks for the recommendation -- I probably wouldn't have gotten past it's title without it.

A Random Walk Down Wall Street by Burton Malkiel

Buffett: The Making of an American Capitalist by Roger Lowenstein

State-of-the-art human-like machine-generated prose ... delivered by 300 baud modem.

Sure, three-strikes-and-out reduces probability of brute forcing any particular account with forced 5-digit password, but if an attacker has a list of just 25k usernames, odds are that at least one is going to get brute-forced.

While I had no name recognition of this brilliant theorist, turns out he is the same guy that wrote Winning Ways for Your Mathematical Plays (recommended). Also found this sad news: https://news.berkeley.edu/2019/04/18/elwyn-berlekamp-game-th...

> Pseudo random number generators try to mimic real randomness, but don’t have the properties required to deal out 70,000 Z-pieces in a row.

Citation?

Privacy Possum? You mean Privacy Badger?

What are the n most useful knots for sailors? Other outdoorspeople? Eagle scouts? All-round handy problem-solver types?

From the paper:

> The main difference in Hanabi is that there is no “cheap-talk” communication channel: any signalling must be done through the actions played. It is therefore more similar in spirit to learning how to relay information to partners in the bidding round of bridge.

Jakob, why did you choose Hanabi instead of bridge itself? Bridge is obviously much more widely known and seems to present similar challenges.

Awesome. What sport?

If someone can figure out CO2 -> C6H12O6, it's probably worth more than $1mm.

> you need to guarantee them that stability forever

In that case, you're going to have to be content with a thought experiment, because there is no entity that can credibly make such a guarantee.