techlatest_net

And here is the video from 1999 [1] showing his obsession with customer which is why customer support is in the DNA of Amazon

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxwjzVW7z5o

To prove OP's point, Google has these great comic books [1][2] to help newbies understand the basics of AI/ML. It makes it fun and easy to understand the concepts compared to going through some video, article or book.

1: https://cloud.google.com/products/ai/ml-comic-1/ 2: https://cloud.google.com/products/ai/ml-comic-2

Is there any real justification behind this fear of close nature of OpenAI or this is just frustration coming out? We had this debate of closed Vs open source 20 years back and eventually opensource won it because of various reasons. Won't those same reasons apply to this situation of close nature of OpenAI? If so then why are people worried about this? What is differnt this time?

I completely second this. We publish VM solutions in all the three marketplaces and find GCP the best as a partner and as a customer. The VMs spin in seconds , cost is the lowest for most of the common services and the web console is fast and does not have the clutter like that of AWS or Azure.

Ever since they got Thomas Kurien as new CEO, there is more focus on the marketing and partnering outside of US & Europe. The recent deal with ARAMCO to setup data center in KSA reflects this.

From a customer base perspective, our experience is that GCP has more developer & startup focused customer base, Azure has more enterprise crowd where as AWS is a good mix of every one.

Exactly 21 years ago, Google got $25M funding from Sequoia Capital and Kleiner Perkins Lead Investment . The announcement also list some other emerging tech companies and it is interesting to see how many of those survived and flourished.

I will second that. We provide VM solutions on cloud marketplace and all our VMs are using fish as the default shell. Both us and our customers love it. Thanks for building it.