Basically the only thing a US nonprofit can't do is give dividends to investors. The nonprofit has to funnel any unspent profit to itself as an endowment, but can also have obscenely high salaries for administrative staff.
813 karma · joined May 31, 2019
Have you worked at a company with a PR, Comms, and HR department?
Also, the real optimal answer won't be found in their proposed setup to find the ideal temp+time to turn a frozen pastry into a cooked one. What you do is store a few of those thawed in the refrigerator and pop them in the air fryer for a few minutes. Then replace with the freezer so the next morning they'll be thawed.
Also, when you start to invent new technology, you're not just a dispassionate objective scientist pushing the boundaries of knowledge. You're an engineer whose products are also engineering society.
Give me a traditional window layout please!
Plato was famous, but only one of the many voices in very long debate. Whatever people were thinking 2000+ years ago, it had already lost its influence by the time of AI's societal debut in the 1980s and is totally irrelevant to AI's impact today. While both may share a mindset, linking Plato to today's techno-bros is a bit of a stretch.
The allegory of the cave still has resonance today. Abstract ideas are timeless. That's the point of abstraction.
But not per their status board (if your status board has to be manually updated, it is not actually a status board): http://status.fairkom.net/
Such a tiny fraction of subscription and ad revenue goes to creators.
> Who's paying Google for delivering that content?
ISPs who have peering agreements with Google.
The ACM has never taken action against an ACM member for an ethics violation that was not directly related to research misconduct in an ACM publication (edit: or inappropriate behavior at an ACM conference). Unlike a medical board or bar association, the ACM has no capacity, resources, or staff tasked to enforce even research ethics violations outside of ACM publications, much less ACM members day-to-day work they don't submit to a publication. And even then, it is up to the peer reviewers and editors of that publication. Otherwise, it remains just a list of suggestions.
At one time the ethics code said ACM members should respect terms of service, which means no bots or web scraping, but that was never enforced. You can find tons of research in ACM publications that uses web scraping of big sites that prohibit it in the ToS. The ACM certainly doesn't have capacity to police ethics violations by ACM members in industry. And if it started to do so, I suspect you'd see ACM membership plummet by those who fear they could be next.
> the history of genocide in North America
Ah, I see where you're coming from.
I was with you until you went off the deep end here.
I'm sorry that it's so hard for you to multiply by 1.1
On an unrelated note, HN rules forbid me from implying that a commenter has not read the article.