HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

textfiles

1,877 karma · joined January 21, 2009

Jason Scott, proprietor of textfiles.com.

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/textfiles; my proof: https://keybase.io/textfiles/sigs/3suXIN5AXKLC-jqt-_mr7ovc-jYpj6fH8vrIZOJNXdM ]

submissionscomments
textfiles··on Thousands of Hip Hop Mix Tapes, Why Not
Jason Scott here.

Most of the comments don't need me, but I did want to address this. I've been ingesting tapes daily by the hundreds for the past week, and it's natural that the collection skews towards the new, since I can get those at arm's reach, singly, with little (relative) effort. I've still got a way to go with the 17,000 tapes I have information on (again, pretty much all post-2000) and then I will either find older sources, or will be contacted by people with caches of older sources.

So, I'd say, "give it time", and remind the people who are not happy that Internet Archive is a library/archive and can only move as fast as it can. But it does move.

textfiles··on The Internet Archive truck has been stolen
Hello everyone! Jason Scott at the Internet Archive. Today, the truck was found abandoned by the San Francisco Police Department, having driven at least once over the Golden Gate bridge during its time away, and is being returned to the Archive tomorrow.

Thanks to everyone for getting the word out - it meant a lot. Hopefully the truck didn't suffer too much for its time away and can be back to transporting data and hardware for the archive shortly.

textfiles··on The Windows 3.x Showcase
We have a working networked version of Windows 3.1 that runs in this environment, but let's do one thing at a time.
textfiles··on Fuck the Cloud (2009)
Salutations, ass-end of the Tech Elite.

As someone who has generated a pretty hefty sandbag of verbiage over my decades online, it's always amusing to see what the Grand Eye of internet arbitration decides is an incredibly important and pertinent subject to discuss in my back catalog. Whether it's my work in guiding volunteers for in-browser emulation (http://archive.org/details/softwarelibrary), my delightful coterie of 1980s BBS textfiles (http://www.textfiles.com) or perhaps my documentaries on BBS culture (http://www.bbsdocumentary.com) Text Adventures (http://www.getlamp.com) or the DEFCON Hacker Conference (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVwaIe6CiHw) ... or, as it is today, one of my many long-form written-down thoughts on all manner of this silly medium many of us have chosen to live our lives.

Oh yes, also that my cat is on twitter and has a million followers. (http://www.twitter.com/sockington) - Lots of people are loaded with knapsacks of opinion about that one as well.

I have found that Hacker News (which is, be clear, an unexpectedly lively extension of Y Combinator) is composed of several diverse groups, all with variant approaches to a linked subject. A linked subject which, as some have pointed out, I wrote 6 years ago, deep in the mists of time.

One group is literally in it for the Money, the gain, the ROI, the endless quest for the "Unicorn", and all their commentary is pungent with the bias and filter of either finding the precious gold coin at the bottom of the shitpile, or are rife with attempts to promote or play up subjects and links of great interest to their financial agenda. Be assured that I could not care less about the current status of the beating of your heart.

Another group seems to be happy to drill down as deep as they can into the mathematics, algorithms, and code of a situation, thinking that if they napkin-blart out enough "facts", they will win some sort of day. I find these people tend to be unhappy about flowery language or effusive phrasing, simply because they've left-brain-dominated themselves into deep pits of nut-sorting and bolt-counting. They use "TL;DR" a lot, as well as, I assume, Adderall. Their heartbeat status is of greater interest to me, if only because I think they are coming from a good place, even if that place smells of Cheetos and sweat.

And, of course, there are Opinion Tourists, my favorite, who might as well be equated with a loud and cantankerous pit of waving hands, waiting for the newly linked (if not newly written) event/opinion/image for their to raise in a mighty roar with a hastily cooked "hot take" on the item. Some of them even optimize the process to not even click on the provided link before the horn honking ensues.

So, "Fuck the Cloud" was written in the deep miasma of when everyone used the term "Cloud" interchangeably with "Magic"; that it was an approach and glory that would lead the experience of computing to a new shangrila. Like any old-timers rife with memories of how we got into that world (and of the echoes of cloud-dom going back 50 years), I decided to write out some of my own thoughts, especially on this attempt to dumb down the populace and separate them from not just responsibility, but control and agency with their data. I have been entirely correct in the general theme - there is a divide within the technical community, of people with admin access and the ability to control any aspect of their work, and then a very large, almost overwhelming set of users who are, essentially, meat stock. And in the same way that meat stock has no particular seat at the table when negotiations of an agricultural nature are conducted, so in the same way are the "users" left out in the cold as a whole range of abilities and ersatz "rights" are stripped away, under the guise of "ease of use" and "leave it to us".

All of this was written without the revelations of the deep, intense surveillance apparatus that is now in place, ensuring that any of this data you control or thought was within your own private space is actually destined to meet you again in an investigation, a courtroom, a warrantless intrusion or a physical SWAT attack. That wasn't even the point.

The point was that user data, treated as something to abuse, monetize, and ultimately discard as a whim, was a complete betrayal of the early promises and experimentation of the Internet. To counteract this trend, I co-founded Archive Team (http://www.archiveteam.org) and our delightful success in many areas would warrant a completely different essay itself - and it has, along with myriad speeches and presentations in the years hence.

I'm sure it might be delightful entertainment for Hacker News to find this or that out on the net and go off, endlessly, in the loop of "This Needs Me" and "Fuck You For Thinking That", but ultimately, these are ridiculous showboat-dances of "what if" and "why not", and I've discovered in the years hence that truly, actions and achievement s speak louder, ever so louder, than words.

Enjoy your day.

And fuck "The Cloud".

textfiles··on File format wiki
Then get editing.
textfiles··on File format wiki
Except from the very first day, the declared final authority falls at my desk, and I am a hardcore inclusionist. So no, it won't be making that mistake.
textfiles··on A Cabinet of Infocom Curiosities
Technically, it was 69,105 neurons.
textfiles··on A Cabinet of Infocom Curiosities
Ah yes, let's get into THAT debate. That's not a quibble - it's barely an opinion.
textfiles··on A Cabinet of Infocom Curiosities
Much heavy lifting in design, layout, and verbiage for Infocom was done by a firm called Giardini/Russell, Inc. out of Watertown, Massachusetts. In fact, let’s just make it clear – a lot of what people think of as “Infocom” is in fact Giardini/Russell. For example: The Zork logo, the names Infidel and Deadline, and, of course, the verbiage of the advertisements I previously discussed. They wrote manual copy (some of which was then re-written by the implementors) and a pile of other stuff. The story of Infocom’s success, for all its considerable talents, is incomplete unless you realize this firm that contributed so much.

That's me a few years back, in http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/2172

I knew putting these up would show some rough feelings. I've done my best to keep that to a minimum - I hope that'll be the case. But be clear - G/R is EASILY one of the most important contributors to Infocom's success.

textfiles··on It Is Done
Or I'm a good photographer. :)
textfiles··on We are barely halfway done
I paid $560 for the courier service Uline provided. The rest was the cost of the 1,200 boxes, regardless of shipping method (Roughly $3,400)
textfiles··on We are barely halfway done
A big part of it was that they were definitely further up a year or two ago and have been trying to fire sale out manuals as they go. The website has been updated infrequently so the number is not as large anymore.
textfiles··on Saving 25,000 Manuals
So your answer is "No, no I really think you do."

I will make a new entry mentioning you especially.

textfiles··on Saving 25,000 Manuals
All your donations are appreciated. It has made assembling the project a thousand times easier.
textfiles··on MAME and the New Emulation Reality
And, more importantly, what changed your mind? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1997159
textfiles··on MAME and the New Emulation Reality
So, what you been up to, lately?
textfiles··on MAME and the New Emulation Reality
Joezy, I am concerned you might not be working towards an offer of code contribution.
textfiles··on MAME and the New Emulation Reality
A documentary on the 6502 chip, a documentary on the place of arcades, and a documentary on the medium of tape.
textfiles··on The Backing Up of the Internet Archive Continues
git-annex is the engine behind this project currently, and a lot of bugfixes, feature-adds and work has happened as a result.

https://git-annex.branchable.com/

textfiles··on The Backing Up of the Internet Archive Continues
There's multiple bits of objectives here - education, research, practice, and awareness. As time goes on, it's obvious that distributed sharing of data is the only real vaccine against the inherent problems of the modern Internet, and learning more about different ways this might be done benefit all.

Plus it's nice to have some of this data scattered about the world.

textfiles··on The Backing Up of the Internet Archive Continues
Currently, the system requires you to check in (using the git-annex facility) on a regular basis. If you don't check in (it's a script run by cron) within 2 weeks, you're considered decayed, and after 30 days, your contributions fall back into the pool and are taken in elsewhere.
textfiles··on The Backing Up of the Internet Archive Continues
Your intel is old, edward ;) they're past 40Gbit now.
textfiles··on The Backing Up of the Internet Archive Continues
It's being overseen by Jason Scott (me) but I am not utilizing other employees of Internet Archive - they're quite busy enough as it is.
textfiles··on The Backing Up of the Internet Archive Continues
Jason Scott here. Just wanted to address the questions that always come up when this project gets some attention. (Also: Come volunteer to be a client! The more the merrier.)

* We are only backing up public facing data. (Roughly 12pb) * We are only backing up curated sets of data. (So less than that.) * We are stepping carefully to learn more about the whole process as we go, documenting, etc. * The hope is this will produce some real-world lessons and code that other sites can use. * This project uses non Internet Archive infrastructure, and is not an Internet Archive project.

It's going well, and the more people who join up, the better. Oh, and support the Internet Archive with a donation - it's a meaningful non-profit making a real difference in the world. http://archive.org/donate

textfiles··on A Piece of Apple II History Cracks Open
Original post writer here; there is a plan to do this.
textfiles··on I Want Your AOL CDs
You are likely keeping them for a reason, but I'd like any and all unique copies.
textfiles··on I Want Your AOL CDs
AOL Client Software, along with game demos, browser installations, advertising, music, utilities, and varieties of promotional material... depending on which CD, and when it was made.
textfiles··on Internet Archive: What’s new with v2
Just to throw additional information into the mix:

* The design was the first major overhaul of the back and front ends of the site in roughly 15 years. * Introduced to the public in a very light was in October 31st, thousands of modifications/fixes have happened since then. * The V2 interface truly hit major audiences around the beginning of January. So it's been roughly 4 months, in which feedback has been huge, and read. * If you visit the changelog, https://archive.org/CHANGELOG.txt - you can see the mass of changes that are occurring, nearly daily. * The site is nowhere near done.

textfiles··on Internet Archive: What’s new with v2
That turns out to be a huge, huge technical issue but I can't imagine a future in which that doesn't happen.
textfiles··on Internet Archive: What’s new with v2
Hi, it's Jason Scott. I work for the Internet Archive but I don't speak for them, in this case.

So, first I'd like to make clear that none of the underlying collections or data has moved anywhere. That is, all the items that are in a collection of, say, newspapers or music performances are still there - the URLs are precisely the same and were designed to be permanent. Nobody's shifting those around here. Google searches work, and the site search works the same, using the same criteria.

Next, in the results pages, which include those "tiles" and infinite scrolling that is not to you taste, if you look in the upper right (next to the "Results" number), there's an icon that changes from tile mode to "list" mode. You can also turn on "details". That makes things into a list form, at least. However, for the moment, infinite scroll will still be engaged. Also note you can sort the list alphabetically, by creator, or by views.

After doing those two steps, is the problem at that point JUST the infinite scroll? Is that what makes it a mess for you? Or is it a different set of issues? I'm happy to hear it in this thread, but also, if you click the "beta" button in the upper right, and write exactly what you'd like, I guarantee it's read.

← PreviousPage 8 of 10Next →