586 karma · joined December 5, 2009
This means that the community-at-large is effectively given the opportunity to vote on a sub-optimal selection of the submitted stories.
This can perhaps be fixed by briefly flashing all new stories towards the bottom of the top news page, to give them a brief chance at wider exposure. One way to do this would be to make a queue, and put every new story on the bottom of the front page for 5 minutes barring a certain number of down-votes for moderation.
This might really effect which stories actually end up on the top news page (though perhaps only for stories submitted during peak times).
I don't know if its fake, to me it almost sounds like the the people on the radio are repeating what he is saying or asking him to repeat something, but one can be fairly confident that the people writing the article misunderstood what was being said.
I think I made out the entire thing, but I was fuzzy on the last word.
I hear: "K narodom nashe rodie, prakldavuyu chilvetchistvu put k Kommunizmu, bifshi cosmonaft umru?"
The first part translates roughly to: to the people of our homeland, I am laying the way for civilization to communism.
The last part to, this former cosmonaut is dead. But I could totally be mishearing that last bit (as the grammar doesn't really work if that is what he's saying).
The audio is very fuzzy, but I think at the end he says something that roughly translates to "the former cosmonaut is dead"
Before that he says something about the people, I can't make out anything about heat or temperature. Apparently the people on the ground couldn't either, which is why you hear "mission control" asking him to repeat himself. I couldn't make out the word they asked him to repeat either.
The "friends of friends" bit is the one that could be creepy potentially, but here as well, all they do is take your friends emails, find other social services on the internet associated with those emails, and display the names of your "friends" (totally public) lists of friends.
This is something you could easily do manually with any search engine.
The typical user has no need for sustained output unless they are torrenting things, being used as a supernode for skype, ect.
I do like the idea though.
It doesn't really matter if the practice actually lets more people use a product, it just feels dirty.
Imagine you have an ATM account, you fall down and cut your face, maybe break your nose.
Now you need to withdraw money for some reason. You are locked out. Now lets also say that you know someone high up that made the decision to buy these ATM machines. You tell them that you are locked out, and he's going to start wondering why he put these new machines in place.
We'll probably get there eventually, but I think we are far from that point right now.
i don't think that qualifies as a startup.
The main idea here is to only allow your personal information off of your own computer in an encrypted form. This seems like a pretty good place to aim for in the future.
The problem isn't lock-in as much as it is privacy. It is better for consumers for all of their private data to be private as they use the internet, instead of having the rely on trusting someone else with the data. Part of the concern is lockin - as in what happens if the service changes their policies or disappears. But this is not the whole picture
I wouldn't disable it totally, they will just move to giving prominence to something else. Just throttle the amount of bandwidth pirated accounts consume. They are likely giving you sales you wouldn't have otherwise.
The problem is how do you make it possible for the best people making music (or whatever other internet good) to completely sustain themselves via things they put online.
The picketers aren't touching you, but you do become aware of the fact that they are there.
It seems like the epitome of peaceful protest.
Like what oppressed workers did in the throws of the industrial revolution?
Its peaceful protest...
Market failures are a real thing, and you need some sort of institution to address them. The internet does nothing to change this, except that it makes it possible to create more discriminating policies that are more efficient (in theory).