thefounder

8gb of ram is not performance.

So it still can’t run the big AI models locally due RAM limitations. Maybe next time!

Gemini is just the worst of the 3 horses. The gov will eventually make them all to bend the knee. PRISM already showed they(eventually) all comply. I personally see this more like PR for Anthropic before the IPO

At least they don’t SPAC their way into the public market but the answer to your question is yes!

Let the retailers decide this year at IPO! The heavy bags must be carried by someone

So much BS from this Anthropic company. They have a good product but just too much slope PR. It’s like they want you to hate them. I can’t stand their “safety” and national security crap when they talk about how open source models are so bad for everyone.

Looks like the end of SO

That’s just as bad. You need to take out the human error out of the equation.

the main issue is the bank using sms and OTP apps instead of something like passkeys and mandatory in bank setup.

I think the main issue with federated apps is the identity and moderation. Without identity verification is hard to moderate so you end up with closed systems where some big CO does the moderation at an acceptable level

Well the most important part seems to be glossed over and that’s the IP addresses. Many websites simply block /want to block anything that’s not google and is not a “real user”.

Yes. It’s like Tesla FSD but for coding with the obvious/inevitable crashes

>> It is good to remove human from the road, the faster the better.

I’m all for this but not to replace dumb people with dumb software. I think the FSD should be treated more like the airplane safety. We have the opportunity to do this right not just what’s the cheapest way we can get away with it.

Giving people more ways to shut themselves in the foot does not improve the safety. I find the entire thing a kind of dark pattern as the system along with misleading marketing makes you lax over time just to catch you off guard.

You get used with the system to work correctly and then when you expect less it does the unthinkable and the whole world blames you for not supervising a beta software product on the road on day 300 with the same rigour you did on day one.

I can see a very direct correlation with LLM systems. Claude has been working great for me until one day when it git reset the entire repo and I’ve lost two days work because it couldn’t revert a file it corrupted . This happened because I just supervised it just like you would supervise a FSD car with “bypass” mode. Fortunately it didn’t kill anyone , just two days of work lost. If there was the risk of someone being killed I would never allow a bypass /fsd/supervise mode regardless of how unlikely this is to happen.

That’s irresponsible at best give it doesn’t support full self driving. I never understood why end users are allowed to just beta test a car on public roads.

Yeah but using a different model for that? Ideally a skilled model that works with the IDE functionality/API would “solve” this issue.

>> The fact that self-driving cars are not permitted on most of the world’s roads is 100% the fault of regulators and those who vote for them.

Maybe a part of the fault is also the self driving systems themselves that keep crashing and killing people. I don’t have data to say with certainty whether self driving cars are safer or less safe than humans(I think they are less safe especially if taken out of their “trial” zones/sampling) but I can tell you that is less acceptable for self driving cars to kill people than it is for humans for “obvious” reasons especially when the self driving cars do this due stupid mistakes that a human driver would not (I.e goes straight into another car in plain day).

are there that many use cases for a model that you need code generated as fast as possible rather than better code at decent speeds?

Yeah but imagine how hard robotics are if we can’t make a dam thing to just speed and turn correctly(I.e 2 params). You also seem to overestimate the inertia of the tech advantage. Being first is not always the most important thing. See google AI as prime example.

Can you give an example of smartness where Gemini is better than the other 2? I have found Gemini 3 pro the opposite of smartness on the tasks I gave him (evaluation, extraction, copy writing, judging, synthesising ) with gpt 5.2 xhigh first and opus 4.5/4.6 second. Not to mention it likes to hallucinate quite a bit .

Am I the only one that can’t find Gemini useful except if you want something cheap? I don’t get what was the whole code red about or all that PR. To me I see no reason to use Gemini instead of of GPT and Anthropic combo. I should add that I’ve tried it as chat bot, coding through copilot and also as part of a multi model prompt generation.

Gemini was always the worst by a big margin. I see some people saying it is smarter but it doesn’t seem smart at all.

The good thing is that now instead to spend 6 months - 1 year working on your app and making sure the code is just perfect you spend just a 1 or two , generate some garbage code but at least publish your app before you burn out. Once it gains some traction like it or not you gonna have to "fix the code" as well. I feel that AI is really a blessing for good programmers/coders because they start to focus more on the business of what they build than on the code.

Why would someone do this?

Whatever happened to crypto/blockchain ASICs

I think OpenAI will IPO at 1T. I don’t want to say bubble but it could be one of these stocks super hyped that never goes anywhere after the IPO(I.e airbnb during Covid)

To me ChatGPT seems smarter and knows more. That’s why I use it. Even Claude rates gpt better for knowledge answers. Not sure if that itself is any indication. Claude seems superficial unless you hammer it to generate a good answer.

But somehow google fails to execute. Gemini is useless for programming and I don’t think even bother to use it as chat app. Claude code + gpt 5.2 xhigh for coding and gpt as chat app are really the only ones that are worth it(price and time wise)

With that way of thinking you would just move in a cave.

The business case for the current robot technology is weak or minimal. If you come up with the business case for a technology from the future then you can as well sell datacenters in space and nuclear power plants on Mars (built by the robots of course)

I think you can get loans in the stock. That’s how “most people” live(and die)