2,089 karma · joined July 22, 2021
This is about being forced against your will by another person or group of people not because you need money, a situation almost every person who works is in.
I also don't have a source but would you agree that the amount of people being forced to work against their will at Mcdonalds is much lower than prostitution?
Your comment was trying to say "what's the line?" right? Like why should one profession be banned but another allowed if X percentage of people are forced to do Y against their will in each.
The line is rape, multiple rapes day in and day out.
*I assuming both still get paid some amount even though they are forced.
Has there been some new release of prostitution, like a 2.0 where they updated the security to prevent abuse?
Stupid joke but nothing has really changed in that realm of things where a study that isn't that old would be invalid.
Isn't that also a crime in almost the entire US?
It's also where sex trafficking comes into play. How would you know consent was given by a sex worker? People who are trafficked to work as prostitutes are often blackmailed and threatened.
Right now there's massive paranoia about this because it's being used as an election tactic but prostitution and sex trafficking are somewhat linked
Explain the Martha Wright-Reed Just Reasonable Communications Act of 2022 Consent.
It passed the house with unanimous consent, had bi-partisan support in the senate, and Biden signed it.
The main feature is that it caps prison phone call costs.
This helps inmates and hurts companies. So explain to me how this slots into your view
https://www.npr.org/2023/01/01/1146370950/prison-phone-call-...
One thing about personal attacks. Some people take sides on an issue based on their political alliance. That means many times their arguments are contradictory. Pointing this or hypocrisy out is a personal attack but it also shows their arguments are disingenuous.
How difficult is it to undo a law that """"protects""" children? Political suicide for anyone
What about other agencies? The EPA for example? Now environment regulations will be a political game and could change drastically as congress swings right and left.
I believe you are misunderstanding the potential change the Supreme Court ruling could have. Each regulation would have to be approved by congress, not appointments.
One year there could be a requirement about emissions from cars then the next none. It would create chaos and damage the country in my opinion.
The vast majority of people don't have control over industrial waste. Of course I can vote for someone who says they will but that doesn't require focus only an action at most once a year.
I believe the OP is using whataboutism to allow himself to be selfish. "Why recycle when celebrities fly on private jets" or to make it more obvious "Why should I be good if another person isn't"
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/12/...
However the FTC abilities may be limited because of two situations. First a surpreme court case that could limit federal agencies in general, likely because of the conservative majority.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/federal-agency-powers-crosshai...
Two, Trump has said if he is elected he will increase the power of the executive branch.
Trump and Allies Forge Plans to Increase Presidential Power in 2025
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/17/us/politics/trump-plans-2...
"Mr. Trump intends to bring independent agencies — like the Federal Communications Commission, which makes and enforces rules for television and internet companies, and the Federal Trade Commission, which enforces various antitrust and other consumer protection rules against businesses — under direct presidential control."
But your concern is that the head of the FTC, after making serious effort within the law to rein in Big Tech, fails Biden will give her a cabinet position.
"Both sides..."