1,161 karma · joined June 29, 2011
But now it’s here, and so are they. It’s probably the same people. It’s probably me.
It recently wrote an entire dissertation for an epic, assuming it was related to some other project, where it had earlier made the wrong guess about a vendor capability (from their marketing materials, no less), and it all had to be thrown away. I cleared the memory, but it appears to be still pulling from some corporate data source i cant control or locate.
I think that last bit explains why European govt orgs have migrated to it, over the open source Eurosky.
I give Jeff a pass though, and make sure I send alternate goodness signals like liking his YT videos after I watch them. He’s one of us.
I don’t write my own - I can’t optimize for the models understanding, and so I just give the skill-creator skill an outline and then have it refine until the output is what I want.
While I didnt find a use for openclaw, it opened my eyes to the potential for distributing software which, once bootstrapped a bit, can interrogate … itself, understand its own requirements, communicate with the device, and become operable.
Add capable small models to the mix, and it’s almost frightening what good (or malicious) software might be able to do.
What would be useful:
- examples of text that can be filtered, and why that would be valuable
- a data flow diagram of runtime behavior, showing how filtering removes unnecessary contextWhich ironically are the same tools you’d need to find out if your users are experiencing unintentional dickovers.
Part of that though requires adopting a security model where thats OK. As I’ve started sprinkling MacOS hosts and guests throughout my network, I’ve needed to adopt other vz tactics.
OPs use of Tailscale mirrors my own, but given the security model of OrbStack it’s mostly a convenience rather than a hard security partition within the lan or even the host.
Am I wrong?