299 karma · joined November 29, 2012
tl;dr hidden services are anonymous
That makes me wonder, doesn't yahoo set the http only flag for their session cookies? Is there any reason you may want javascript to access the session cookie?
Suppose it's a good time for everyone to verify that their websites properly set http only on any cookies you don't want to access via javascript.
Any one company having access to such a big database of information about pretty much everyone that has ever used a web browser should never happen, but it happens at Google.
Almost everything is covered by copyright, it's indeed not too hard to figure out if something is covered by copyright. It's much harder to figure out who owns the copyright on something, and it's almost impossible to figure out if a certain file is authorized by the copyright owner.
Just because a file is popular doesn't mean it's infringing. Can you guarantee this popular file wasn't posted on twitter by the artist for a marketing campaign? Can you guarantee the artist didn't upload it to a torrent site to get attention? No, you can't. You'll just take a flamethrower approach and many legitimate files will be removed in the process.
1) magnet:?xt=urn:btih:f8b92a305da8a7d12081cd348ba9859b299b3486&dn=Martin+Luther+King%7E+I+Have+A+Dream+Mp4&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.publicbt.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.istole.it%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.ccc.de%3A80
At the very least it's copyright infringement, although I'm not sure it's criminal copyright infringement.
The article recognizes this and suggests that the people who care about freedom should make the initial 'investment' by creating an account, thereby increasing the value of the network for everyone else.
Edit: This is in reply to points about software patents only.
The paper is very much worth the read if you have some spare time. http://www.phrack.org/issues.html?issue=65&id=6&mode...
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2012-Novembe...