Why, given that these are, in the context of a strict mostly-functional language, basically an unnecessary function wrapping. ;)
-14 karma · joined October 19, 2018
https://karma-engineering.com/lab/wiki
Why, given that these are, in the context of a strict mostly-functional language, basically an unnecessary function wrapping. ;)
Why should an ordinary joe like you and me care about FAANG shareholders?
Also there are some visa restrictions - in some places you could stay up to 60 days, Indian visa is usually just 3 months.
Nevertheless, remote Indian and Nepalese hilly areas are absolutely wonderful.
Keep local data only until you quit your browser.
And the money for covering expenses and living came from..?
> It's about having a vision.
I have the vision that crap like Hadoop should be rewritten in Go. Shall I dive in and start re-writing?
Where are all the crypto visionaries nowadays?
I have been burned by 1 and 3 more than once.
Also I have lots of ideas which actually have no real demand, like to list cheap, remote, nice and quiet, organic locations in Asia yet suitable for remote working and long-term stay, like Sikkim or Nepal or Ladakh (order of magnitude cheaper than Thai coast line). But, unfortunately, there is absolutely no demand for this kind of arrangements, because there is almost no demand for remote work in the first place.
Yeah, MIT/Stanford/CMU degree pays back.
This could be a title for guy who decides whether to use React or Vue, webpack or whatever.
I could understand that someone, who are writing, say, FoundationDB or some Scala for inhouse finance processing could get ~$200k, but my mind absolutely refuses to accept the fact that Javascript coding is being paid this way.
Technically, this is not exactly true. Messages are propagated to superclasses if an objects has no receiver, so they are more messages than method calls.
Also, the design decisions were to make objects an isolated entities which communicate by message passing. They does not have implicit mailboxes like it is in Erlang, and are not strongly-isolated, share-nothing entities (which is what makes the whole system fault-tolerant).
However, objects are definitely has some concurrency, but no async features in modern terms.
Python is a good "glue" for optimized C++ or fortran libraries which the core of things like tensorflow or numpy. Everything fits together nicely.
Also learn about these very efficient viruses which are wiping themselves out by killing all its hosts too quickly. From the point of view of the Rest Of Nature humanity is a virus.
What does he mean by "probably"? How could anyone in PL and teaching community ignore decades of research and development of teaching materials in Scheme and Standard ML?
Scheme (Racket) should be the first language. Standard ML or Haskell - the second. One will tap into two distinct whole sub-cultures (US and British respectively).
Also this way of teaching C as a specialized implementation language which must be used together with special tools is the right way. It is useless to teach C without or prior to machine architectures and assembler language basics.
C is by no means a general purpose language, even when the industry is using it this way and should be taught only as part of specialization in systems programming.
First of all, autism is better characterized as inability to cope with one's own emotions, which results in a state similar to permanent tension or stress (without being aware of it or knowing any better), which autistic people are trying to compensate with acquired/learned behavioral patterns that keeps them less tense (avoiding eye contact is the obvious example). This is why performance in some tests is lower - we have real difficulties with self-control, with concentration on the task. Working memory is OK, when we in the rare state of so-called flow we perform well. Usually above average.
Solitude and some meditation techniques (habitual return to state of being 100% idle) helps a lot.
1. Apple. Really.
2. Setting up your own Linode with postfix, dovecot and roundcube is just a half of an hour. Domain name registration is about an hour.
Of course, you won't get any services, which is the main product Google is trying to sell indirectly (it monetizes your content, services are free as long as you your generate content).
For example, everything should be a reference by default, and use of explicit & is stylistically bad.
Or why in let mut iter = a.iter(); iter is mut? It should be a simple closure which follows a protocol. In what sense it is mutable?
And such small warts are literally everywhere, together resulting in a clutter.
A functional language uniform defaults (everything is an expression, everything is a binding which implies everything s reference) are much better.
Lots of chinese are habitually drinking very strong green tea all day long from one these fancy termos-like transparent cups (an ages old cultural phenomena, I suppose) and there is no side-effects despite ordinary caffeine overdose.
Same is true with coffee. Societies with a coffee-culture, like Turkey or Italy have huge numbers of addicts but uncorrelated number of liver injuries.
For example, ML's (and Erlang's) unification of bindings via unified pattern-matching everywhere is a major achievement and canonical example. Haskell's unified approach to typing, is another. Everything is an expression of Scheme and even Lisp's unification of representation of code and data is the great discovery of old times.
PL design is hard, design of good runtimes (OTP, Go) is even harder. Ignoring almost everything which was good and true in PL field is definitely amateurism.
I don't want even start about what kind of nonsense Tokyo is. Universal event-driven frameworks is the same madness as J2EE. On the other hand, ports, typed channels or futures or pattern-marching on receive - support of fundamental concepts in a language itself is the right way.