6,269 karma · joined August 27, 2020
Now they are getting the Fisker treatment.
The whole setup is out of this world: A vilified Chinese company at war with the full American empire. Its leader mumbling military clichees like "surround the cities from the country side". Its headquarters being a Disney-land of copied classical European architecture. And at the same time it is delivering breakthroughs that two years ago would have been thought to be impossible.
But while Huawei's compensation package is generous, its working culture can be challenging, according to chip industry managers.
"Working with them is brutal. It's not 996 -- meaning working from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., six days a week. ... It will literally be 007 -- from midnight to midnight, seven days a week. No days off at all," one Chinese chip engineer told Nikkei Asia. "The contract will be for three years, [but] the majority of people can't survive till renewal."
The most interesting thing is that they are abandoning windows - hopefully they will also abandon Intel at one point.
Anyway. If you listen to the Tsai interview he seems more concerned about US regulators than Chinese.
https://www.nbim.no/en/publications/podcast/alibaba-co-found...
Alibaba co-founder and Chair: China, Jack Ma, AI and basketball
And while smart and sympathetic, I cannot help to think that Alibaba is a company of the past belonging to a time of a certain US-China order that is no more. The future of Chinese tech belongs to companies that are much more fast moving, fearless, and aggressively deep tech than what Alibaba aspires to be.
FSD robotaxis are pie in the sky; it is not going to happen anytime soon, not going to justify Teslas valuation, and it is not at all guaranteed that it will be Tesla that succeeds with it first or capture the majority of the market.
I remember a talk by Clayton Christensen talking specifically about Intel and how they setup the Celeron division to compete with themselves (based on his advice).
A key property of tech in economics lingo is that it is “natural monopolies” - all fixed cost and no variable cost.
This creates these winner takes all games. In this case both Intel, SGI plus others knew the rules and it just ended up with Intel taking the prize and it all becoming Wintel for a decade or so - basically until the smart phone allowed enough capital to be accrued to challenge the old monopoly.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-03-03/why-wa...
Apple’s Car Was Doomed by Its Lofty Ambitions to Outdo Tesla
And repeated numerous times.
The article was written by the same Bloomberg journalist who broke the story that the project was canceled.
Obviously they would have had to create a simpler project before the fsd car. Just like they did the iPod before they did the iPhone.
Just say no to the logging industrial complex.
https://git.rootprojects.org/root/xz/commit/6e636819e8f07033...