Intuitively, to me, given how dangerous birthing was for the mother, I imagine only seriously disabled babies - that would never be autonomous as an adult - would be killed.
But I guess we'll never know.
270 karma · joined May 29, 2020
Intuitively, to me, given how dangerous birthing was for the mother, I imagine only seriously disabled babies - that would never be autonomous as an adult - would be killed.
But I guess we'll never know.
What they want though is to be "reachable" by everyone without the drawback of people actually demonstrating a negative view, very much like removing dislikes from Youtube. They want to remove the dislikes from their online personas but done for everyone so it's less obvious they are hiding their critics. Because at the end of the day they need to be famous to get sponsorships or money whatever way they do it, hence they need to pretend to be "reachable".
And he's the one participating in performative nonsense and not the government and funding agency?
26 to 74 is just double, and most likely some are more common in written communication than others.
“Despite the considerable size and density of the built-up area, there is no evidence for central authority,”´
Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.