681 karma · joined September 27, 2011
- don't speak, let those you want to support speak instead
- remove names from resumes on first few passes
Isn't this every brand since Bernays came along?
I use OMZ mostly because of dotfile inertia. There is some slight weirdness (vaguely remember something about negative/exclusion globs) compared to vanilla zsh, but it isn't bad.
It is possible to declare the system of executions a travesty, while also observing that the lower classes are willing to phsyically intervene in them. Perhaps it is even possible that the reformers were made aware of the injustices by the lack of respect the lower classes demonstrated for them.
Perhaps a reformer with the goal of abolishing executions would pen a treatise that was justified in the moral terms of the ruling class, rather than based on the emotional state of the working class. One would look to address your audience after all. I'm not familiar with the cited reformers you claim are conflicting but it sounds more like aristocracy convincing aristocracy, rather than an aristocrat attempting to sway the masses with pamphlets.
I question whether you read this text in good faith, or are simply searching for bits you can pick out to summarize on a message board and construe as contradictions.
Many philosophers aren't concerned with providing readers with ideas in the system of efficient exchange of language and labor hours. For many in critical theory the project is the opposite: to show how the systems of exchange and efficiency dominate our meaning-making.
That quote is the concluding sentence of a paragraph which cites at least three documents:
* Argenson, 241
* Hardy IV, 56
* Richet, 118-19
Does your copy have the parenthetical citations removed?
Right, and refusing a Brainfuck's assumptions does not deny it turing complete status, or render it unable to produce ELFs.
For some, it illuminates the nature of an abstract turing machine. For others it appears to be nothing but sound and fury.
I'm extremely torn between "The Coming Insurrection"s call for drop-out politics and Marxist production reforms.
There is a plethora of writings of substance in the continental tradition. Writings that we should not ignore. 'Discipline and Punish' is one of them. I recommend 'The Dialectic of Enlightenment' by Adorno as your complement to Popper's writings.
On another note, I don't generally see the value in antagonisms between paradigms or presentation forms. I find value from the analytical perspective and from critical theory, and being able to dance both dances is illuminating. I don't think the empirical process can reveal the entirety of the human experience. Steadfastly stumping for one paradigm over the other is no more useful than being a vim/emacs zealot.
If Deleuze or Foucault don't grok for you, it doesn't mean the authors are _wrong_ or lying to readers to obtain mystic status. Just like someone not caring to study Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory shouldn't write off the entirety of mathematics.
Enforcing a uniform profitable culture where all real estate is available for developers' whims is not a "neutral" act.
Anyhow, those small wheels are too ugly to be seen riding.
This is along the lines of the traditional abstraction level debates, rather than anything particularly wrong with boost. I think it gets singled out unfairly as being a particularly difficult 3rd party library.
If you were adding boost to a project just to do some weird spirit/preprocessor hacks, I'd be wary. But if you told me you were going to write yet another cross platform ASIO wrapper because you couldn't figure out how to compile boost I'd be even more concerned.
Our website is a bit thin but we have experience with imaging at XGA and 1080p. The spatial-temporal dimensions of the data with this sensor are quite different from pin-hole FPA imagers. You can trade off spatial resolution and temporal resolution with more freedom than readout ICs. You can also skip the image and go straight to information measurements for pattern/event matching.