tiberious726

Anything with an sfp slot and a decent "optic" should blow tp-link's link stability out of the water. In about the same price range, have you tried mikrotik?

In unconfigured emacs, you can literally just go Buffer>Save in the toolbar. If you didn't know to look in the buffer menu, then you didn't read even a little bit of the tutorial that appears when you open it

The extra unused memory might even act as shielding to cosmic rays, but the extra electrical load on the memory controller might more than balance that out for unbuffered sticks

Seedvault is the /worst/. I ranted about it here a few months ago, and the lead dev says he's aware they really need something better: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42541520

Exactly this. Hell, for OP's use case of accessing things like twitter, a good old fashioned https proxy would be entirely fine, and likely not even illegal.

Didn't the terms of that deal define AGI as "an AI that generates at least 1 billion in annual revenue"?

If you use the -m flag with enroll-keys, won't that also load the MS keys, which the Nvidia firmware should be signed by, allowing verification to pass?

Eh, that's basically what we have now with boards where you can delete the MS keys and enroll your own. Just with different defaults and no support nightmare

Firefox is not fine. If you think it is, please tell me how to disable BASIC http auth in it. (This is a serious problem, as it will send passwords unencrypted over a non SSL connection, and my users have been trained to type their sso password into every box they see (I know.... Not my doing)).

Step 1) world war 3

Step 2) some drunk invents FTL

Step 3) the Vulcans show up

If the client actually supports the optional name constraint extension. Is it acceptabley widespread nowadays?

Eh, I tried using Firefox again for a few months when manifest v3 was announced, nothing worked quite right, then I ran into this: https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/firefox-chromium.ht...

So Red Hat Openshift.

Everyone I know who works with IBM i (used to be system i, as/400 before that) absolutely adores it. Gods do they every nickel and dime you tho.

> The real thing that made me switch was multiple OS updates per week

You're complaining about timely security updates?

TPM+PIN is pretty great, is a shame it's nearly never used.

You just need to use a lisp implementation that has a tree-shaker if you really care about binary size for since reason

I always preferred this one: https://youtu.be/5-OjTPj7K54?si=TYuCLJ9_2WvRHcHM

> That has been done in the past

Could you share some examples of how the old systems did this?

My favorite is pressing '!' while inside a sudoed or setuid less.

No: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Va...

In practice, everyone writing new projects uses it, but when you choose to interact with existing code...

> if I ever win the lottery and don't need a job I'm going to spend some time learning Plan 9.

I'd recommend adding OpenGenera and IBM's systems I and Z to that list: a whole bunch of us build careers out of unnecessary unix make-work too

C-u N C-y where N is the number of pastes.

Yeah, some DE clipboards implement kill-yank sensitive. They're great!

With 128 bit pointers encoding security and providence information. And a unified memory space, no files, just addresses with RAM as a cache for persistent disks. Might as well be from 2080.

Welcome to IBM. Each new acronym is an extra fee, annually.

Z/OS systems are rackmount nowadays too, they just take up the full 42U.

At least back in the POWER8 days those z/Linux systems were the fastest you could buy, and IBM was super happy to let you overclock them: their reps told me that was just more CPU sales for them.

Better?

Kill-yank semantics give you a full kill-ring, that's what your yanking from. CUA gives you a single copy-slot.

First off, thanks for all your work on graphene! I run cyber security for a company in the defense space, with data-sovereignty requirements, and you guys are the only serious project around. You should think about selling support contacts, I know a lot of BlackBerry refugees still looking for something serious. I bet you could sell support and a barebones MDM as subscription /very/ successfully.

(As an aside, I've been very happy to see you are still involved with the project!)

> GrapheneOS has a built-in encrypted backup system

Do you mean seed vault? It's really not satisfactory. For one, I should be able to encrypt my backups with any key of my choosing, on a hardware token if I so choose, not be forced into its silly codeword system or nothing at all. AES, gpg, and X.509 compatible support would get you all of the way there.

Even just letting backups be exported unencrypted, so I can easily and automatically use a trusted device to encrypt it the way all my other data is would make it so much more usable.

Frankly, the current implementation just reads as one of those ridiculous things trying to force the uneducated/uninterested to be secure, with no escape hatch for people who actually know what they are doing, nor for enterprises who need secure mobile devices, but also know an end-user will /never/ successfully take a backup on their own.

Common lisp -> elisp is an incredibly frustration transition. Get ready to really think in terms of dynamic scoping.

I did it the other way, and going back to elisp is /hard/.

The strong version is disproven in the original paper: they mention concepts that cannot be expressed in English and then proceed to explain them. In English.