654 karma · joined December 20, 2025
All the big tech companies have now quietly removed their climate goals. You don’t need to know anything else.
Maybe we should revive the practice. Not sure Louisiana is the right destination for the revival.
At a certain point you know enough about how the sausage is made that the youthful illusion of love is impossible.
Every machine is reasoning given form. The spatula encodes understanding that the pancake needs a flat supportive surface to help it flip without breaking. Computers happen to be general purpose solutions to arbitrary problems. It’s fine to love the solution To a problem and not the embodiment of the solution.
All books are available.
“Control” is ambiguous.
Passive surveillance would be your example. This program is specifically activated when an active investigation is in progress.
As far as I can tell this program is addressing a real crime problem in SF, it is getting real criminals off the streets and helping police do their jobs.
If some policeman abuses his authority and misuses the tech we should 100% prosecute them for that crime. There is as yet no report of a police officer misusing that tech.
There are however thousands of examples of police using that tech to arrest real criminals, criminals who commit property crime and violent crime. Those people are off the streets.
I am cautiously optimistic about this program and so far fully support it. We should pay some pen testers to attempt to misuse the system and see if the internal controls are sufficient to catch them.
San Francisco used to not investigate or prosecute any of those crimes. Laptop stolen out of a car? Nothing to do. Now they catch video of it happening, follow the license plate, arrest the perpetrators. Catalytic converter stolen? We don’t investigate that.
Yes, police have shitty track records of abusing authority and technology. Does that mean we throw out all authority and technology? If you do we get the chaotic lawlessness San Francisco experienced for years.
So what’s the middle way? 1) Use the tech to fight crime. (Check! They’re doing it) 2) prevent abuses of that technology and authority (in progress, let’s see how it goes)
Consulting is hard. At a junior level you can teach people to interact with clients how you want. When you hire a senior person you want their advanced skills. Locking your employees in to a particular path for client interactions is dumb. Getting project specs over email one sentence at a time with 24hr delay is double dumb. If the customer can’t articulate what they want, a meeting is way faster. A demo of a working example (already written) is quite reasonable. “Ok like that only different in these five ways”
Count yourself lucky that you don’t work with people who obviously don’t jive with you.
Learn to fix the robots. https://archive.ph/u3uJu
So let’s ban the tourists (not the Airbnbs that are the actual problem)
What you fail to realize is that Tourists bring money to your city. They buy drinks from your favorite bar. Lunch from a struggling local cafe. They pay cab drivers. They buy your cousin’s crappy art on the street corner, because while it may suck it sucks in a distinctly Barcelona way, and that’s what people come to experience.
You’re banning the people who pay money to come appreciate your culture.
You do you, but it doesn’t seem very clever to me. Happy to stay away forever. There are 500 other cities in the world I can go visit.