In short, if the computer said so, it is a fact, in court.
Lots more information here
https://evidencecritical.systems/2022/06/30/briefing-presump...
613 karma · joined June 28, 2013
In short, if the computer said so, it is a fact, in court.
Lots more information here
https://evidencecritical.systems/2022/06/30/briefing-presump...
You need a smart meter. It's electricity only.
You (and I) get £50 credit with this link: https://share.octopus.energy/happy-frog-559
You can get electricity at 7.5pkWh. With a battery, I get 12h of cheap electricity per day, and the rest at higher prices.
At the coldest time of the year, I'm getting an average of 20pkWh.
This is just a fraction above break even gas/electric.
The rest of the year its no contest, heat pump wins.
My energy usage for heating is down by 60% year on year
My bills are the same as they were 3 years ago.
Before: Jan 600kWh electricity, 3300kWh gas = 3900kWh
After: Jan 1580 kWh electricity, 20kWh gas (cooking hob)
So in total, 41% of previous amount, and for heating, 30%.
So yes, for crappy uk houses heat pumps are totally fine.
Adding in solar pv, and a time shifting battery, and the bills are maybe £2k per year lower than they would be.
>>> import pint >>> r=pint.UnitRegistry() >>> usa = r.Quantity(9833517,"km*2") >>> h = r.Quantity(35000, "ft") >>> v = usa * h >>> naturally = r.Quantity(0.1, "ug") / r.Quantity(1, "m * 3") >>> natural_total = naturally * v >>> natural_total.to('ton') <Quantity(11563.6821, 'ton')>
Natural total in USA, up to 35,000ft is 11,000 tons, and added is 113,000 tons.
So the leaded avgas has added 10x.
Assuming uniform distribution up to that height, and that it doesn't disappear. Neither of those things are true, especially as the lead is absorbed by people and animals.
> We estimate that piston-engine aircraft have consumed approximately 38.6 billion gallons of leaded avgas in the U.S. since 1930, excluding military aircraft use of this fuel, emitting approximately 113,000 tons of lead to the air.
When will companies learn that stock buybacks are a terrible way to spend their money, and in AA case, their debt...
Their debt would be at 50% of its current without that buyback, and its entirely possible the stock price would be unchanged.
Buybacks basically never have the stated outcome of boosting the share price, they just use up all the money, so now your company can't spend it in making itself better.
Oh the games, oh the kwalitee.
This is a double win!!
Taking an ICE vehicle off the road, and also, using the replacement vehicle less - so less road wear, less energy used, less traffic, more pedestrians and cyclists and car sharers.
This oft-repeated claim is incorrect. Burning hydrogen in air produces NOx and other pollutants, and this confusion is promoted by fossil fuel companies that persist in telling us that it's fine to keep burning things.
Hydrogen is great, but burning it is not sensible, be it by itself, or mixed into natural gas.
The author doesn't understand what repudiate means, and therefore all the arguments are nonsensical.
To repudiate means, according to Cambridge dictionary "to refuse to accept something or someone as true, good, or reasonable"
So, when a transaction or email is repudiated, it means that someone is claiming that they didn't do it, despite the fact that it was done.
Non-repudiation is a characteristic of a system whereby a user of the system will find it difficult or "impossible" to repudiate that they did an action in that system.
So when the author claims in a title that "Non-repudiation of emails is undesirable" they are getting the words and meaning mixed up.
It is repudiation that is undesirable, and that's why non-repudiation is such an important characteristic of some types of system.
sync boot
Perhaps now they will report their true carbon emissions.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/aug/24/carbon-c...
Preferably Walk, cycle, get a bus, get some transit, share a lift, drive a small car.
It's a tricky question to get a real answer, due to all the vested interests, lack of real research, and differing views of "what is good"
Which is better, Amiga or ST (Amiga!)
Same for cloud, same for <pattern>
If everything is a hammer you'll hurt your thumb/hand/arm.
At least now (for some time) the pattern is named, so broadly when talking about this sort of thing, the name conjures up the same/similar image in everyones heads.
There are all sorts of inputs to the choice of architectural patterns, including budget, scalability (up and down), criticality, security, secrecy, team skills and knowledge, preference, organisational layout, organisation size, vendor landscape, existing contracts, legal jurisdiction ....
Sure, ask about competency and capability, but not years of experience.
By asking about age you started programming, you may be discriminating against parental income levels, family situation, schooling, gender and all sorts of other things.
It's only because sites are jam-packed with spyware that all these horrendous popups are everywhere.
If you need a complex consent manager, it's a signal that you're doing the wrong thing.
Ads are not strictly necessary, nor visitor tracking, btw.
No details on refrigerant and therefore GWP / F-gas that I could find.
On the plus side (for you!), mitsubishi data/api/app sucks so bad, I can only imagine it is powered by EJB - there is so much potential upside there.
"Open in app" whizzing about "I love tracking cookies" over half the screen.
Download a region file from maptiler, or make one.
That's it.
It's about 2h work, using certbot for certificates.
If you want to create your own styles, it's slightly more fiddly, but essentially it's https://maputnik.github.io/editor/#0.41/0/0
Host on hetzner for €3/month.