2,902 karma · joined June 21, 2011
Maybe they could for example point their amazing models to their GitHub issues, and use their power to actually fix the bugs and myriad of papercuts before solving cancer and world war/peace/whathever the stockholders believe they want.
Corporations are egregores, governments are egregores - and our track record of aligning them to our interests is pretty poor, so why should AIs, another and smarter egregore, be easier to tame?
You can ask you favorite LLM to compare the parallels; I did and it was enlightening.
https://blog.gardeviance.org/2015/03/on-pioneers-settlers-to...
This week I have done considerably less work, and 2 days in, 54 % of Max usage is gone.
I hate this bait and switch cycle, and seeing how OpenAI cut its limits (5x raise from 0.1x api price to 0.5x api price for their max plan, so new $500 plan gets less usage than previous $200 plan) I think this will get worse still.
> If you find two ants in your kitchen, the best estimate of the total number of ants in your kitchen is not two
About the time.
Seriously, both flagship GUI apps (OpenAI and Anthropic) are a full of glaring UX issues (for ChatGPT it's not naming their windows, so window switcher has 10 entries of "ChatGPT" and you can cycle them all to find the one you want).
https://www.reddit.com/r/Garmin/comments/1vzaz4w/we_live_in_...
"17 shot by gun" "car drove over a family"
No. In both cases there was a person killing people.
Doctors: I have trouble even starting to describe how not even wrong the slop generated organs are, and how dangerous would it be for someone to learn on this thing.