627 karma · joined March 20, 2022
It's pretty foolhardy to tell people to go out and gamble and brush off survivorship with vanity. Back to the original parent's comment, they could've easily taken that Google job and continue development of their side project which didn't raise any money and grew organically, anyways.
Today: $2500
Japan's strength comes from following the rule to the letter but it also comes with the ridiculous overheads that puts downward pressure on productivity.
I'm sure some westerner will gawk at anything novel, for instance the usage of fax machine and the claim that its secure from vulnerabilities. Yes, paper can't get hacked but the overall disadvantage slows down Japan Inc., and its entering now the 40th year of stagnation and unlikely to improve going forward. In fact, it's already being outclassed by its neighbors who adopted bandwidth and digitization at the turn of the millennia.
This article has absolutely no merit whatsoever, the same attitude can be applied to Japan's worse problems like ijime culture over the slightest things.
With that money you could've funded any side project that generates recurring revenue.
I don't get why you should quit your job, take on tremendous amount of risk for a highly improbable outcome with heavy survivorship bias.
I don't get why people are so upset at my comment or why that should warrant ad hominem attacks.
I merely mentioned that parent could've had a job at Google and benefited from it. He made it sound like it was a power move, it really wasn't. My argument is only that he took on even more risk by not taking advantage of Google's offer and growing stock prices to fund his passion. He doesn't seem like the type to get distracted by a day job either.
I'm still a bit steamed from being gaslit all throughout the mid-2010s years when we were told <div id="root"></div> + SPA was The One True Way of building web applications.
omg. tell me about it. One CTO I remember flat out getting angry that his reason for using React was because Facebook was doing it. that's itWe are going to see more reversion to '05 days, with financials of SaaS as interest rates rise. I remember one CFO getting mad because spending $2 to make $1 doesn't make sense as an enterprise company and that his reason was because we are in a new economy.
Perhaps I'm extrapolating but it seems that the boring, predictable and old is that way because it's been through market manias, both financially and technologically during periods of novelty recycling.
I'm super relieved to see that many of us are beginning to see the emperor without clothes.
Then you might actually be driving a lambo now too ;)
Loading...
distutils already loaded from default channel
Loading micropip, pyparsing, packaging
Loaded micropip, pyparsing, packaging
Loading ssl, openssl
Loaded ssl, openssl
distutils already loaded from default channel
pyparsing already loaded from default channel
Loading setuptools
Loaded setuptoolsOr are these people going on r/wallstreetbets to write long DD upvoted by bots, purchased accounts, awards, under VPN to make their purchases seem organic?
Still wouldn't it be obvious somebody doing that routinely and establishing a pattern of unusually high win rates before earnings?
Sort of like how poker companies catch cheaters, simply by knowing the average win rate to be within a specific distribution, even the slightest deviation or outlier would send its risk management scrutinizing play by play to determine a pattern.
Wouldn't large state actors with web of shell companies be able to obfuscate and get away with impunity? Literally printing money and also weaponizing a foreign financial market.
the ideal world you described does not exist on this planet.
from datetime import datetime as dt
from utils import add_class, remove_class
from js import console
tasks = []
# define the task template that will be use to render new templates to the page
task_template = Element("task-template").select('.task', from_content=True)
task_list = Element("list-tasks-container")
new_task_content = Element("new-task-content")
def add_task(*ags, **kws):
# create task
task_id = f"task-{len(tasks)}"
task = {"id": task_id, "content": new_task_content.element.value, "done": False, "created_at": dt.now()}
tasks.append(task)
# add the task element to the page as new node in the list by cloning
taskHtml = task_template.clone(task_id, to=task_list)
taskHtmlContent = taskHtml.select('p')
taskHtmlContent.element.innerText = task['content']
taskHtmlCheck = taskHtml.select('input')
task_list.element.appendChild(taskHtml.element)
def check_task(evt=None):
task['done'] = not task['done']
if task['done']:
add_class(taskHtmlContent, "line-through")
else:
remove_class(taskHtmlContent, "line-through")
new_task_content.clear()
taskHtmlCheck.element.onclick = check_task
def add_task_event(e):
if (e.key == "Enter"):
add_task()absolutely bizarre and juvenile sort of the behavior you would find on reddit