top_sigrid

This is so true. My favourite example is when Top Gear made fun of the German word "Doppelkupplungsgetriebe" by spelling it, when it is quite literally the translation to "dual-clutch transmission". It stil is hilariously funny, but you cannot conclude that German is weird with these words.

As I was asking myself, what the comparative value is for other cars, from the article: For "Other electric cars inspected" the rate was 9%, for the Tesla Model 3 2020 model it was 23%. This indeed sound very significant.

"The popular model has defects in particular in the brakes, lights, wheels and steering, according to inspection data" also does not create trust.

Or missing crucial moments because they mistake a referee's bald head for the ball: https://www.theverge.com/tldr/2020/11/3/21547392/ai-camera-o...

See also: https://rubyonrails.org/2024/11/7/rails-8-no-paas-required

I don’t think they do, do you have any source? A slim phone is expected next year, while foldable iPhones seem definitely to be in development, but rumors do not point to next year.

https://www.macrumors.com/2024/06/03/foldable-iphone-unlikel...

If you question something like public transportation being climate friendly as being scietific sound, maybe you should bring up some evidence or data to back this up.

Also some anecdote about how buses where used at some major event does not allow any conclusions to be drawn about public transportation in general.

Also "there is a lot of marketing and money involved - especially in green energy" is a rather general polemic statement, which could also some clarification.

"... to singularly focus on a cheaper model, The Information reports."

The title is a little misleading.

The added value of this article was indeed very low.

These are formfactors that come from the datacenter industry and probably will become very widespread over the next years.

The ServeTheHome Youtube channel had a good overview video about those drives around 2 years ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29Nh3p6779E

From the Article: "Microsoft is so confident in these new Qualcomm chips that it’s planning a number of demos that will show how these processors will be faster than an M3 MacBook Air for CPU tasks, AI acceleration, and even app emulation."

This one is working: https://archive.ph/WYdVW

This was interesting, although a small list. But it is definitely lacking any sources to back these claims. From reading the article I have no idea, where the author got these anecdotes from.

Is there any reason why you would assume this in such a snarky conspiracy-esque tone?

Like someone above pointed out, a rule of moderation on HN literally is, that stories about HN or ycombinator companies itself are moderated less [0].

[0] - https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...

That is his bottom line, but not a TLDR. He writes in detail about his experience owning a Tesla for years and lists many reasons he doesn’t like about it, besides positive experiences.

Can you elaborate, what kind of liability you are referring to and what the current case is in the Netherlands with regards to that?

Do you have any source to support this claim? Or from what do you conclude this?

I guess this could have a hint about using Rails & Turbo Native in the title.

Nonetheless, great work!

Maybe they think it's legal, OR they know its illegal but possible fines don't put them off and are accounted for as cost of doing business.

Is this emulation layer inside of Windows or are you talking about Rosetta 2?

For a „best guess“ you’re making quite detailed assumptions, of which I have no idea and you bring up no reasons how you can assume these.

In the note they state that the exploit was in image processing with PassKit and iMessage. Your comment somehow reads like an extrapolation what might have happened without any more actual knowledge that you share.

Any advantages/features this offers over UTM?

You should actually put an [NSFW] tag to this.