tosapple

The way I understand it, which may be dated: is that if it's automated or robotic it doesn't qualify as an "unreasonable search or seizure".

First it's your nationality, then your language. Next maybe you're church or your music.

Data is a liability, it's omnipresent. Permeating.

This is the third person advocating button squeezing, as a reminder: IF a gun is on you the jig is up, you can be shot for resisting or reaching for a potential weapon. Wireless detonators do exist, don't f around please.

Good idea, but this is why you image devices.

The 'extra users" method may not work in the face of a network investigation or typical file forensics.

Where CAs are concerned, not having the phone image 'cracked' still does not make it safe to use.

Exercise like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests...

Right?

Wait until you live through what Argentina or Brasil have then see how you feel about redress, petition and speech.

While they ditch Microsoft, Amazon and Oracle: we still use Linux, Sel4, ASML and ARM.

There's lots of interesting stuff to watch out for.

Just wait until they switch us to the deutchemark.

Bitcoin doesn't work properly without power or network access extending over days though.

Again, not endoring any specific case just endorsing SPECIFICITY, COST, and "Collaterals".

During WW2 both germany and the UK as example were carpet bombed to assail industry, does that help you to understand my position better?

Vietnam too.

I wasn't commenting on any particular case. I was stating that flipping a switch is less costly to reverse than blowing up a dam.

What I am starting to appreciate about these digital infrastructure attacks is that they may be reversible and or temporary. It can be a nice feature.

I think in the US legally they have to have a beacon while flying now, but my thought the other day was about them being parked/down.

I was thinking the other day that ALL drones SHOULD be considered LIVE explosives. It's probably never a good idea to handle one if you're not trained.

An LLM could speak FPGA.

Good luck auditing that.

for the sake of being downvoted: MASM.

How is that all not part of the judicial branch, e.g. the "courts" ?

If it was elitist we wouldn't have the right to assemble or bear arms.

Some of us can do both, at once!

Why did you edit out the third paragraph about finding a single exploit on target being slanted against having to secure a whole system?

Also, smuggling a single binary out of a set of systems is likely far easier than targetting a source code repository or devbox directly.

This is a good point but may be moot. Our consumer-facing LLMs speak C, Python, and JavaScript.

'Decompilers' are work in the machine code direction for human consumption, they can be improved by LLMs.

Militarily, you will want machine code and JS capable systems.

Machine code capablities cover both memory leaks and firmware dumps and negate the requirement of "source" comprehension.

I wanted to +1 you but I don't think I have the karma required.

Weapon of mass de-desertification.

You can spray it from anywhere, source it from god knows where. What flavor of snowcone do you want this week?

For now, training these things on code and logic is the first step of building a technological singularity.

Define source, compile, and library.

Maybe part of the problem is faith in the courts to sort this all out. Notoriously, they take forever.

I'm going to buy a NAAGGA hat.

The only option is to vote, if you block roads you will be labeled a domestic terrorist. Insurrection act? Things may get alot worse.

What are they going to do with all these holding cells when the immigrants are gone?

At this point in time you don't consider using an LLM to "vibe" code a "rat's nest"?

SuSE slowroll is news to me, thanks.

I've got bichons, and they're great dogs.