373 karma · joined July 17, 2020
I think it was an ISP issue. At the time IP6 was in beta. Now it's enabled for everyone and the issues stopped happening.
I don't think X11 ever "just worked" for me. Every computer I installed Linux on had X11 problems.
The XKCD about Xorg.conf was very relatable back then: https://xkcd.com/963/
I haven't listened to it yet. But I have heard the Ad too many times. (Outside the US podcast ads are mostly for other podcasts)
https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-svetlana-svetlana-107693...
So I just set up a network share on her computer for it and launched it from a network mapped drive.
It just worked. I was kinda surprised. But I guess if the devs don't do anything fancy there's no reason it shouldn't work.
And the kernel has device mapper disabled so I couldn't use kpartx to mount a drive image with partitions. Also means dm-crypt or LVM2 won't either.
But these kinda kinks can be worked out I think so I hope we get a good out of the box experience in a few months.
Although if you have windows it also tends to run there too.
Then after complaint they completely changed to make it an over the counter drug. Although as far as I know it's still not available at any chemist I know of. But you can still buy it as Leather cleaner from few sex shops. (Less than it used to)
I haven't been able to boot mine. But I have no UART adapter to see whats wrong.
Those systems startup into "Cache Contained" mode. Where the Boot ROM is copied to CPU Cache and there's no main memory yet. The code in the ROM has to initialized main memory before it can use it.
The chilling effect of it is. What if they demand you give them information you do not have a way of accessing. (Eg Signal). How would you comply? Do you have to pre-empt whatever requests you MIGHT get and ensure you could back-door a user if it were required. The law also seems to imply that ASIO could demand a single employee at a company backdoors something and they wouldn't be able to tell their co-workers.
And a hard disk array with 4 drives in raidz (like raid 5).
Main advantages: * I moved my root drive to another drive and did it entirely online without needing to cp or dd everything just add new drive to pool, remove old drive (and wait until it's done, but you can keep using it while it copies) * It's way faster than MD, md spends 10s of hours initializing or resilivering big drives. zfs just formats it and your good to go. * Subvolumes and snapshops are great. You can give a folder different file system properties. (Eg make /var/log compressed and disable it for /var/cache/pacman because it's already compressed) * Docker is quicker. * Although BTRFS has snapshots I do find ZFS's more intuitive. (eg subvolume can be nomount in ZFS which allows you to organize and apply options recursively easier)
Check for bugs in Ubuntu ZFS before installing updating. They do it differently than other OpenZFS options.
I'm not currently using ZFS send for backups. So I can't compare it to Deja dup.
Which is kinda funny as it's become a meme about WoW players standing in fire and dying when they couldn't just moved. (To much frustration to healers)