Given the apartment disconnect between the reality Murray describes in his reports and the reality we can observe today, do you think you'll read his content with a higher degree of skepticism in the future? His headlines are all calibrated for maximum outrage, that alone turns me off from reading them. Edit to eat crow: only one article has a sensational headline
To give some meat to my post, some landlords of low income housing abuse Delaware's unusual business regulations to obscure their identities and operate illegal roach motels in other states; these same people make excuses about how they're at risk of being harassed by the same tenants they underserve and evict, and therefore feel justified in hiding their identities.
Edit for clarity: the tenants can't sue, being low income. My original post about suing anonymous shell companies was facetious.
When it's goods and not services (delivery is the service here, I guess, not the food as a good), usually it's termed dumping, and I'm fairly sure it's illegal. I don't know if that language ever gets used for services.
If the voting was just user-specific, that would be fantastic. Because I include a gobbledygook search term to exclude all Pinterest results, Google requires me to perform captchas very frequently, which isn't ideal either.
Not who you are replying to that's a bit of a strawman: he never said anything about Victorian era gentlemen. The book he mentioned doesn't either, at least in the first few pages. Why do you start talking about that? Usually when other people mis-state what I say, I get pretty angry.
Video games have real magic in them: a powerful motivator to work shitty dead end jobs for too many hours and inadequate pay. Hopefully more aspiring developers will develop independently, I would rather do hardscaping than work in a studio where my labor didn't belong to me.
It's very much not intended to be a democratic body so I'm not sure why you would fight on this hill. In my view we've essentially become a failed state because of one party's institutional stranglehold on the Senate.
I never said it didn't, Hastert was Speaker of the House when he introduced it, but it's since come to dominate the legislative process in both chambers. I trusted my use of the word infection conveyed that meaning
The key problem is essentially the Hastert rule and its infection of the Senate. Legislation is only considered by leadership, who only concern themselves with counting beans.
The last thing I want to do when I'm actually in Blender is context switch. I'll look at the subreddit some other time, but making it easier to distract myself doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
It's a decision that puts reddit at odds with the user experience. That said, just switch your mobile browser to "use desktop site" or however your browser calls that feature. You have to wrestle with a
(an?) UI designed for big screens though, beats not being able to see anything at all.
FWIW that's very close to California state law, one of my buddies is that guy who can tell the construction workers to drop everything (they hate him!)
I'm not who you're replying to, but don't you think that given we know pill mills exist, it's likely the data is actually highly location specific? I.E., a city with one is more likely to have lots of ODs compared to the national average? Have you taken a statistic course? At this point I'm not sure what you're objecting to anymore.
You're referencing media I don't know, I don't understand why you don't think the scope of the opioid crisis that has claimed thousands could involve the deaths of 12 people with 1 thing in common. Pill mill pharmacies are a thing, and some of those pharmacists have been charged with crimes.
I'm with you on adblockers at least. I believe it was mobile youtube ads, which I've seen be highly personalized before. I do remember the video was one that minors were more likely to watch (gaming). My concern is that the alcohol companies were actually targeting an underage demographic, which is actually not illegal, since their industry "self regulates" their advertising.