829 karma · joined February 12, 2015
The fascinating bit to me is that there is a consolidateMultiples function in go/src/go/types/lookup.go (lines 286-304) that detects when multiple embedded types at the same depth provide the same field name. I wonder why they don’t do this for all levels. How deep could this even be in practice for it to matter? You could just have a hashmap with them all.
Nobody, especially not the title of this post, says anything about this being “innovative” or “omg”.
I think you are right that there is an Apple mental field that controls people, but I actually think the effect is on the other side.
Most Apple fans just comment on something new and go like “hey, look how neat this”. The haters, on the other hand, respond with more or less the same thing multiple times even in the same thread.
I understand if a kid does it, it’s innate to humans to side with Pepsi or Cola, with Xbox or PS, but for an adult, it’s just sad.
If you love tech, just appreciate new things regardless of who the company that makes them is. And if you don’t, then why waste your time on hating it all the time? Just get a hobby.
I use most of the same configuration on nixos too
The whole point of spending that much money for them is to run massive models, like the full R1, which the Pro 6000 cant
If codex was half as good as they say it is in the presentation video, surely they could’ve sent a request to the one in chatgpt from their phone while waiting for the bus, and it would’ve addressed your comments…
Or do these people just bet on the post money world of AI?
Its extremely fun to have a clear requirement that is not supported by a piece of software that you use and then work around it until it works
That being said, isn’t it strange how the community has polar opposite views about this? Did anything like this ever happen before?
To make sure I tried 3 times in a row. Same result.
I feel like in the emperors new clothes story.