HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

useflyer

357 karma · joined April 24, 2011

submissionscomments
useflyer··on The end of Facebook
Honest feedback:

I visited Tusulog (the name should be re-evaluated) and there was very little description of what it is, what it does, why its good, etc.

I then registered and was told that the service was meaningless unless I invited friends. Ok. Try to wedge out of the chicken and the egg, or piggyback on something else, because in all honesty, theres no way I'm inviting friends to a service of questionable value.

Something something "its not what your service does, its how people use it". Right now, for all I know, Tusulog is the most genius website ever made, I just wouldn't get to the part where I discover that.

useflyer··on Ask HN: Please Review My Startup, http://cityfootprints.com
Great concept, ditch the background, improve the tagline. 'Discover new adventure' makes me think this is for extreme sports or backpacking trips, not a new hamburger joint.

The backdrop probably violates copyright, is cute, but causes me to not take the product seriously.

useflyer··on The Quora post that killed Bitcoins. Please discuss if his arguments are valid.
Economist/founder here. And somebody who has not yet commented on bitcoins. Watching otherwise intelligent people adopt these is hilarious. I won't speak to the tech side (I'm sure its strong). Bitcoins are, in fact, an outright disaster/scam.

1 - as highlighted by the author: bitcoins are equity positive in their creation. we can trade with seashells as the medium (painted red so distinguish them as special currency, of course), but every time somebody goes to the beach with a bucket of paint, they get rich. money creation in its traditional sense (generally, except countries with serious issues) does not create equity, it only increases liquidity. major difference. tomorrow we could all adopt a new currency, but we would generally have to back it with something else of value (sort of authors point #2, weakly explained). bitcoins are the creation of 'free money' out of thin air. we can assign it value (if we dupe others into taking it for goods/services), but its value-less 2 - the computing power devoted to this game is completely wasted. look at this from 30,000 feet -- all of these smart people with smart computers are crunching numbers on a frivolous exercise and not for something productive. total deadweight loss

bitcoins are the equivalent of beanie babies. you could buy a car with those, and they became currency, albeit very briefly. but the inherent value is that of a stuffed doll. bitcoins have a negative inherent value

useflyer··on WhereBerry (YC W11): A Social Network for Making Future Plans
what differentiates whereberry from a calendar is that you can see all of your friends calendars, too. If you want your friends to see that you're going to the beerfest, it saves a conversation/invitation

the trick will be curating or culling the feed, we all have a lot of FB friends

useflyer··on Should every child be made to play chess?
I've always been an adept chess player, but I never spent the required time to become truly competitive. I agree with you that skill and ability differences lead to predictable outcomes; functionally, how would an educator address this in using chess as a learning instrument? Speculating as a non-educator, dividing the class into skill subsections would lead to more equal and competitive play, most likely increasing both motivation and learning.

My co-founder joined our start-up after spending a year traveling through Asia, and brought back with him Chinese Chess. The pieces are incredibly similar to traditional chess, with slight movement variations. We adopted the game as our 3am work-break for a while, and were able to build up a record over a few weeks. Unlike traditional chess in which my win rate would be near-absolute, he was able to win approximately 25% of Chinese games, with his win rate stable over time as we both developed our knowledge of the nuances of the game.

← PreviousPage 3 of 3