2,946 karma · joined July 20, 2008
How to run a business: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs
From May 2022 - Jan 2023 · 9 mos
I believe that whatever little "edge" that gave me in learning math in school compounded exponentially over the years. I always felt "ahead" of the standard school curriculum, and that created a virtuous feedback cycle of success, which bred confidence, which bred success, and so forth.
Just a little nudge here or there at home can make a big difference.
Unless you're asking about the randomized graph sparsification of Benzur and Karger, in which case the output is correct with high probability [0], but like with many randomized algorithms, is not guaranteed to be correct.
Building machine learning systems is vastly different from building operating systems which is vastly different from embedded systems which is vastly different from networking which is vastly different what most of us do (myself included), which is building CRUD apps. We're just solving different problems. Of course there are common themes to writing good code, just like there are common themes to performing science, but the code and solutions will look almost nothing alike.
This is qualitatively different from the founders collectively having a majority of the shares (even factoring in granting tons of equity to thousands of employees), or, if not, they at least control a majority of the board seats for a long time, if not forever.
How would this computer fare against the top 10 best players collaborating(or even top 90-100)? I would bet it would lose big time.
It would destroy them in the same way. The marginal value of each additional human brain quickly approaches zero (or perhaps even negative as the team tries to communicate/collaborate).The top 10 chess grandmasters in the world working together could not beat the best (or even "mediocre") chess engine. Not even close. They're practically playing different games.
But the BB function has a second amazing property: namely, it’s a perfectly well-defined integer function, and yet once you fix the axioms of mathematics, only finitely many values of the function can ever be proved, even in principle. To see why, consider again a Turing machine M that halts if and only if there’s a contradiction in ZF set theory. Clearly such a machine could be built, with some finite number of states k. But then ZF set theory can’t possibly determine the value of BB(k) (or BB(k+1), BB(k+2), etc.), unless ZF is inconsistent! For to do so, ZF would need to prove that M ran forever, and therefore prove its own consistency, and therefore be inconsistent by Gödel’s Theorem.The reaction that synthesizes LK-99 uses an unbalanced recipe: for every 1 part copper-doped lead phosphate crystal — pure LK-99 — it makes, it produces 17 parts copper and 5 parts sulfur. These leftovers lead to numerous impurities — especially copper sulfide, which the Korean team reported in its sample.
Jain, a copper-sulfide expert, remembered 104ºC as the temperature at which Cu2S undergoes a phase transition if exposed to air. Below that temperature, Cu2S’s resistivity drops dramatically — a signal almost identical to LK-99’s purported superconducting phase transition. “I was almost in disbelief that they missed it.” Jain published a preprint on the important confounding effect on 7 August.
[...]
“That was the moment where I said, ‘Well, obviously, that’s what made them think this was a superconductor,’” says Fuhrer. “The nail in the coffin was this copper sulfide thing.”
Science is hard. Kudos to everyone involved for trying to replicate it and figuring this puzzle out.
I'm not saying it's the right thing for the board to do (if I were on the board, I would've suggested he keep his pay even or take a cut), but it's not right to say that Sundar gets paid more because he has "coercive power" over employees.