384 karma · joined September 23, 2013
Yet, I have not seen a rush to "fix" any of them the Python way.
But looking up the 1M elements directly in a BTree will usually lead to 1-2 cache misses and depending on the data element size, may even fit in the L3 cache. Then, what is this bloom filter saving me from?
All the big app stores that are also part of another purchase (e.g. hardware in this case) will almost inevitably have monopoly problems (nobody can compete with Apple on speed of devices so Apple can raise the "prices" of apps). You are talking about the technical aspect that sideloading should be allowed (i.e. some competition), but this is not enough - eventually this competition should have some form of an "equal" start, probably by allowing them to install the market from the App Store, which is what Telegram wanted in their case.
Similarly, I am sure that if PASemi is spun off Apple, it may be the hottest CPU company in the world. I am sure that the Apple services will also do better outside the Apple hardware group. There are plenty of innovations and certainly there is the tendency to use them to raise the prices for consumers (which is illegal) as opposed to grow the market. I will refrain to say if Apple if guilty in this case, just saying that if hypothetically it is, this is not the end. In fact, many good things may happen in the long term by actually applying the anti-monopoly laws and breaking up a few companies instead of working around the laws.
Of course, there are positions where this kind of skill is unnecessary and I cannot know everything about the false negatives. But failure in these areas also correlate with poor coding skills, at least in my experience of a free hundred interviews.
So my guess overall is that GDPR is not enforced at a larger scale and we are very far from enforcing the requirement to have "Accept"/"Decline" buttons equally usable.
Yes, some companies are 100% remote and they do well, but I think it is because they hire from another less competitive (for compensation) pool. I.e. they pay low end silicon valley salaries in cheap markets and manage to get very high-end talent.
Of course, judging by most of the comments, the users are completely happy with this. Some are throwing money on their monitors despite saying it is a compromise. So you are right that a different device is/was quite unlikely.
At least as a side observer it looks like a huge number of very large registers take large portions of a core, for sure consuming a lot of power as well, just to sit idle while the core is running JavaScript. Can somebody with CPU architecture experience say what is the real tradeoff here.
It looks like this until they ask you to leave a review. Then the questions are like how was the check-in, the check-out, the parking lot and the cleanliness of the room. Now, if 3 out of 4 are good, then you just scored a dirty place 7.5/10. If you put cleanliness on so-so, then it is 8.7. Scores get super inflated to the point that all places are 9/10.
But I am guessing there is a reason. These aggregators must look like they contain only top-notch ads. And so all metrics are inflated.
But in all cases, I would not expect that a serious research can outright beat the current NNs by 10x on all dimensions. This will take some time (and may not fully happen) and this paper is certainly a great advance.
- hp (or Apple) can sign you up for this, but then they cannot call it "buy" in the shop. Rent an iPhone (Android phone) or install a printer may be what it should be.
- they need to inform you about the price. In EU a shop cannot write prices without VAT. Install for X EUR + Y EUR per month is what should be on the sticker.
- finally, there is the antitrust. If somebody tries to replace Y with ads, this must be legally part of the price. Higher price for consumers is what makes a good reason to split a monopoly.
The design was very nice, but a bit over complicated. Things looked like a control panel, which maybe makes us feel like pilots, but intimidates most users. The open dialog is a good example. Drop down elements, lists, directory list, label for selected directory. Later iterations fixed this and nowadays apps try to avoid selecting files altogether if possible. Overall, design has improved a lot since then, maybe except for the touch additions.
https://github.com/pediredla/Algorithms/pull/3/files
It looks like a linter, but maybe there is more.
What I am saying is that not only they track you, but they explicitly break the top extensions that fix this. From this point of view, I have no regret for any of their ads being blocked.
This also renders nil the argument about "don't use the product if you don't like their (ad) practices". Tracking across websites without consent is illegal in most of Europe, yet they do it extensively.
Another very interesting course is "Reliable and Interpretable Artificial Intelligence".