http://www.amazon.com/Meet-Your-Happy-Chemicals-Endorphin/dp...
291 karma · joined November 5, 2012
http://www.amazon.com/Meet-Your-Happy-Chemicals-Endorphin/dp...
From what I gather [2], WHOIS often matches sub-domains before top-level-domains, making it easy for someone to create a sub-domain such as 'microsoft.foobar.com' with false records that will populate before the actual domain.
It seems that using the following WHOIS query returns registrar information for Microsoft.com, though it requires sifting through the 'spoofed' results: 'WHOIS =Microsoft.com' [3]. You'll have to wade to the bottom of the results.
[1] MICROSOFT.COM.ARE.GODDAMN.PIGFUCKERS.NET.NS-NOT-IN-SERVICE.COM MICROSOFT.COM.CAN.GO.FUCK.ITSELF.AT.SECZY.COM MICROSOFT.COM.EENGURRA.COM MICROSOFT.COM.FILLS.ME.WITH.BELLIGERENCE.NET MICROSOFT.COM.HAS.A.PRESENT.COMING.FROM.HUGHESMISSILES.COM MICROSOFT.COM.IS.A.MESS.TIMPORTER.CO.UK MICROSOFT.COM.IS.A.STEAMING.HEAP.OF.FUCKING-BULLSHIT.NET MICROSOFT.COM.IS.IN.BED.WITH.CURTYV.COM MICROSOFT.COM.IS.NICE.WHEN.TOASTED.COMKAL.NET MICROSOFT.COM.IS.NOT.HOSTED.BY.ACTIVEDOMAINDNS.NET MICROSOFT.COM.IS.NOT.YEPPA.ORG MICROSOFT.COM.LIVES.AT.SHAUNEWING.COM MICROSOFT.COM.LOVES.ME.KOSMAL.NET MICROSOFT.COM.MAKES.RICKARD.DRINK.SAMBUCA.0800CARRENTAL.COM MICROSOFT.COM.MATCHES.THIS.STRING.AT.KEYSIGNERS.COM MICROSOFT.COM.MORE.INFO.AT.WWW.BEYONDWHOIS.COM MICROSOFT.COM.RAWKZ.MUH.WERLD.MENTALFLOSS.CA MICROSOFT.COM.SHOULD.GIVE.UP.BECAUSE.LINUXISGOD.COM MICROSOFT.COM.SHOULD.INSTALL-GENTOO.NET MICROSOFT.COM.SOFTWARE.IS.NOT.USED.AT.REG.RU MICROSOFT.COM.WAREZ.AT.TOPLIST.GULLI.COM MICROSOFT.COM.WILL.BE.BEATEN.WITH.MY.SPANNER.NET MICROSOFT.COM.WILL.BE.SLAPPED.IN.THE.FACE.BY.MY.BLUE.VEINED.SPANNER.NET MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZ.IS.0WNED.AND.HAX0RED.BY.SUB7.NET MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZZZ.GET.LAID.AT.WWW.SWINGINGCOMMUNITY.COM MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZZZZ.MORE.DETAILS.AT.WWW.BEYONDWHOIS.COM MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZZZZZ.LOLLERSKATES.RENDRAG.NET MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.IM.ELITE.WANNABE.TOO.WWW.PLUS613.NET MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.GET.ONE.MILLION.DOLLARS.AT.WWW.UNIMUNDI.COM MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.LOLLERSKATES.RENDRAG.NET MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.IS.A.GREAT.COMPANY.ITREBAL.COM MICROSOFT.COM
[2] http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/6D00L0K00G.html
[3] Domain Name: MICROSOFT.COM Registrar: MARKMONITOR INC. Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 292 Whois Server: whois.markmonitor.com Referral URL: http://www.markmonitor.com Name Server: NS1.MSFT.NET Name Server: NS2.MSFT.NET Name Server: NS3.MSFT.NET Name Server: NS4.MSFT.NET
[1] http://pathsensitive.blogspot.com/2015/05/i-like-doing-thing...
>4. You need to be going wider than deep right now.
The author's argument is roughly that working a at a startup is limiting because you will work only a single problem because a startup is focused on solving only a single problem.
I disagree.
1. A company that seeks to solve a single problem is a company that has focus; I would argue that many startups lack focus. Many startups do not know the specific problem that they are solving nor for whom. Much time is spent on product/market fit. So, I disagree with the premise that startups are solving for a single problem. Successful ones do, yes, and that brings me to (2).
2. The idea that you will work more broadly at a successful, time-tested company than you would at a startup does not seem accurate. Startups are known for allowing people to wear many hats for a reason (because they often require people to wear many hats). For individual contributors, roles at a Fortune 50 company will be far more specialized – and opportunities to join projects even slightly outside your domain of expertise will be far less prevalent.
This is why I think the argument is really about in-house vs. agency work. Agency work will teach you their methods and provide you with exposure to a range of clients and industries, sure.
3. The premise that because your startup is focused on solving a single problem, you will not get to work on a variety of problems or get to 'try different things' makes me scratch my head... If only solving a problem were that simple, that efficient!
Perhaps, there is some value in segmenting test-takers in their ability to learn and apply an arbitrary set of rules in place of their own. But, perhaps not.
I'm 3 weeks into the program and this is the first time I've been even remotely successful at improving my sleep.
I sound like an advertisement.
I disagree that too many characters or too much instruction is a sign of a bad interface.
For users trying to complete their desired task, an interface lacking instruction/explanation will often cause lower task completion rates and longer average task completion times than an interface with verbose instructions. This is especially true for new users.
Don't get me wrong: I dislike wordiness and consider myself an advocate for simplicity, minimalism, and concision – and that might be the author's sentiment. However, while bloated instruction may hinder task completion and user engagement, incomplete instruction will prevent it.
I believe more useful measures of good instruction are when it is presented, where it is presented, and how well it is understood by users.
For example, a well-designed mobile app avoids a text-heavy interface by disclosing the appropriate amount of instruction at the appropriate time. Limited screen real estate happens to be a handy constraint in this case, and transfers more instruction responsibility onto a well-designed onboarding wizard. That wizard will really only get one shot to educate users, usher them to their 'aha' moment as quickly as possible, and hold their hand through the few actions that strongly influence successful user engagement and retention.
They courses were intended for international diplomats preparing for exams or relocation that require (at the least) conversational proficiency in their destination's local language. So, you learn the basics as quickly as possible without compromising understanding for rote memorization.
If your question is the former, and thus regarding rank, then there are a few resources from where you could begin pursuing an answer to your inquiry [0].
If your question is the latter, Hacker News has clear guidelines [1]. When I find something is not immediately of interest to me, I like to pause thinking about myself for a moment and ask myself, 'would this be of interest to others in the community?'
Further, based on the recency of the post and upvotes, the answer to that question is 'yes, there are some numbers of 'hackers' or Hacker News readers who find this article interesting.'
[0] http://www.righto.com/2013/11/how-hacker-news-ranking-really... [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Presentations are not substitutes for documents.
At a workshop on presenting information, Edward Tufte introduced the idea of beginning meetings with a high-resolution transfer in the form of a printed document. In short, you prepare a document in advance, print a copy for each attendee, share it at the beginning of the meeting, and give people plenty of time to read and digest the information.
The benefits: -each person can read and learn according to their cognitive style and at their rate of consumption. -time spent taking notes is converted to time spent thinking and analyzing -information can be communicated much, much more quickly than it would be through oration and a deck
Hm, I would wager that there is a considerable population of people who would want - and use - a personalized, local search engine, so long as it lived up to its promise.
Second, people have preferences. My hunch is that people's criteria for finding a restaurant are more nuanced than simply '[finding] a place to eat', or a place that serves food. They may want to find a place with Thai food that's affordable, or an American restaurant with vegan options that rarely has a wait, or a pizza place open at 11pm within walking distance of the job they're walking home from.
Last, there are 26,000 restaurants in New York City. For people living in metropolitan areas, there are many options from which to choose. Fortunate people are not living in survival mode or using apps to seek minimum means of shelter (nod to Maslow and his hierarchy). The drivers in decision-making are more complex and could be a careful balance of any number of factors, such as convenience, speed, cost, acceptance, mood and so on.
Add in entertainment, parks, museums, music venues, activities, and so forth - and personalized local search becomes increasingly valuable. If Foursquare can accomplish its goal and distill the signal from the noise, save people time, and allow them to have delightful experiences, then I would want it, and use it.
Other people might, too, but I can't speak for them.
Urchin Tracking Module was an analytics package that Google acquired way back when.
UTM defines a set of query parameters that Google Analytics, and other web analytics platforms, use to capture and provide and information about a referring source (or 'channel') to a webpage. At the highest-level, the buckets are direct, organic, referrer, social, email, display, and paid search.
The three UTM parameters that are required to track 'campaigns' in a web analytics tool, such as Google Analytics:, are Utm_Source, Utm_Medium, and Utm_Campaign.
Example: http://stilldrinking.org/utms/utm-mangler.html?utm_medium=so...
If you clicked on the link above, it would inform stilldrinking.org's Google Analytics property that you, the visitor, came from Facebook and are part of the 'jan-15-hn-woop-woop' campaign.
The UPP project began in 2008 and - from my conversations with several people living in favelas - was part of a larger effort to improve living conditions, which it has to an extent; some favelas now have basic sewage systems, for example. However, the police presence was seen as ineffective and the project disingenuous in that it was inspired by the desire to make Rio a stronger attraction to tourists during the World Cup rather than by the concern for the welfare of people living in favelas.
Additionally, the relationship between law enforcement and residents was also quite crooked. The Guardian reports that "80% of Brazilians are afraid of being tortured by their own police force," but the study was conducted by Amnesty International. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/18/brazil-...
Last, I can't imagine policing in favelas to be an easy job. When I visited a pacified favela, the police unit walls were lined (50+) with large bullet holes.
Alfred 2 (search and a lot more)
aText (text expansion)
Adium (Chat)
Adapter (audio/video filetype conversion)
Caffeine (prevent display from dimming or sleeping)
Chrome (browser)
Colloquy (IRC client)
Dash (documentation and snippet browser)
Dashlane (password management)
Doubleplane (window resizing)
Dropbox (cloud storage)
Evernote (notes, bulky)
Firefox (browser)
F.lux (smart display brightness)
Handbrake (video transcoder)
Hazel (file/folder automation)
iTerm (terminal replacement)
Jumpcut (store and recall clipboard history)
MailMate (email)
Mou (markdown editor with live preview) Readkit (RSS reader)
Screenmailer (free, easy screencast creation and sharing)
Simplenote (notes, lean) Skype (calls)
Spark (hotkey)
Sublime Text Editor 3 (text editor)
TicToc (time tracking)
VLC (media player)
I admire people who challenge their own certainty.
'See, I have the advantage of having found out how hard it is to get to really know something, how careful you have to be about checking the experiments, how easy it is to make mistakes and fool yourself,' said Richard Feynman. 'I know what it means to know something and therefore, I see how they get their information and I can't believe that they know it.'
Good presentation on types of locks and approaches to picking: http://www.blackhat.com/presentations/bh-europe-08/Deviant_O...
And a guy who knows a ton about picking: http://deviating.net/lockpicking/slides.html
2. 'How to Solve It' by G. Polya (http://www.amazon.com/How-Solve-It-Mathematical-Princeton/dp...)