787 karma · joined December 5, 2012
One funny thing I see it doing is deleting seemingly random comments lines, for example if a file has a comment that spans multiple lines but doesn’t use a multi line comment syntax. It just chooses one at random transforming the once useful comment into slop.
I don’t see them fixing this any time soon, and thus human in the loop is a requirement to use these tools effectively. That is unless you love your slot machine dopamine rush enough to ignore quality gates and respect for your peers time.
I plan on focusing primarily on these areas:
- mobile experience is first class, even on old/slow devices
- diff viewer is fast even on extremely large pull requests
- stacked pull request support
- user interface is modern, accessible, and theme-able with a light touch of whimsy
- search is accessible from anywhere
- opinionated keyboard shortcuts and commandk palette from day one
Many other longer term goals that I’m not mentioning here for now while the roadmap is forming.
I’m working on an open source Forgejo browser called Joui. It’s coming along nicely, and is so much snappier than GitHub in every single way.
Moving everything from GitHub to Forgejo and Tangled for now. These outages haven’t effected me for the past month because of this.
We need the pragmatic engineer more than ever.
The point I’m making is that we give the spotlight to people who are making absurd claims. We have not achieved the ability to remove the human from the loop and continually produce value-able outputs. Until we do, I don’t see how any of the claims made in this article are even close to anything more than simply gate-keeping slop.
The “what is this trying to do?” has never been harder to answer than before. It creates scenarios where 99% is correct, but the most important area is subtly broken. I prefer it to be human, where 60-80% will be correct, and the problematic areas begin to smell more and more gradually.
In my experience LLMs, at times, may hide the truth from you in a haystack made of needles.
For this reason I don’t think it’s actually a good name. It should be called planning-shit instead. Since that’s seemingly 80%+ of what I did while interacting with this tool. And when it came to getting things done, I didn’t need this at all, and the plans were just alright.
Node is great, but scaling Elixir threads is more so.
I have built electron apps for fun that utilize React Server Components entirely offline.
> Even if your app does not implement any React Server Function endpoints it may still be vulnerable if your app supports React Server Components.
The other style I like is a single sentence with a single link to the actual wiki.
Since we defunded education in my area, my wife left teaching behind. She says the LLMs will let students ask whatever questions they want, but they make poor educators.
Have you seen vert.sh? It does on-device conversion of audio, images, and documents and is open source too.