If people don't want help, why force it upon them?
Disclaimer: I love Android and 100% of my slates are running it. I love that it's free. Check my profile, it's all I do all day.
I'm just calling out your "Joe the Plumber" reference.
713 karma · joined May 29, 2011
If people don't want help, why force it upon them?
Disclaimer: I love Android and 100% of my slates are running it. I love that it's free. Check my profile, it's all I do all day.
I'm just calling out your "Joe the Plumber" reference.
Could the federal reserve theoretically give a forbearance on interest payments? The debt owed to the public and international financiers (China,Japan) is fairly insignificant compared to what's owed to the Federal Reserve, and could probably be paid.
What happens if we pay everyone except ourselves?
What are free markets making worse here? He agrees that participants should be allowed to buy and sell TLDs at whatever they are willing to pay. How is that not free market? He suggest we fight this buy not paying for it. How is that not free market? His only complaint seems to be that the price is ridiculous, and ICANN should be "better than that".
The price of something is what someone will pay for it. If you don't have a problem with people choosing what they will pay for, then you don't have a problem with free markets.
Complaining about confusion for users, cell phone towers dotting the landscape (?), and that some other people would spend their money on something else (free market), do not help your claim that free markets make it worse either.
I've always tried to agonize over drawing some unique conclusions from a variety of source material. Looks like the more efficient method would have been to just reword the wikipedia article.
All of the stories about education bubbles, unemployed graduates, etc, seem to make a lot more sense when you see data like this.
As a result of the cheating, grade inflation becomes worse and a possibly highly able candidate with a 3.4 GPA may completely miss the "GPA filter" on a resume sorting algorithm for a cheater with a 3.6.
When I thought of a computer notebook doing this, I was envisioning a keyboard on the bottom like any other netbook.
I suppose in the tablet sense it might be possible.
A rectangular form factor for display has been the standard for decades. All applications, save for some desktop widgets, are shaped accordingly.
Putting rectangular designs on this would waste lots of space at the corners, and I don't see a ton of developers jumping to go support a triangular display for their UIs.
The last time I had to interview (being an engineer), I was sent 7 resumes on a Monday for interviews being conducted on a Wednesday. I checked out any links they put on their resume, apps in the appstore, etc. If they did not feel they could be bothered to tell me about something, then it will remain a mystery to me.
That said, I'm not implying we have built in instructions to go create a townhous. Simply that there is possibly a driving force that compels us to create, then a reward for doing so.
At this point though, we've simply changed the medium from sticks and mud to Python and Minecraft.
The actual article mentions almost everything he does, then focuses on wage increases as worsening the effect. This blogger decides to focus on 55+ employment, which he already wrote about. How is one pre-conceived narrative and the other not?
Granted. However, in a post about how correlation between unemployment and minimum wage is overstated, I feel his defense should be more rigorous than: A) Irrelevantly point out Bush was in office, and B) Simply post another correlating statistics.
The blogger is editorializing worse than the WSJ here (not that the WSJ article was much better). Essentially all of the counter points were mentioned in the WSJ article up front, then they focused on minimum wage worsening the effect.
I'm not necessarily agreeing with WSJ on this one, but this guy's article is just as meaningless.
I supposed this depends on the design/location of the capacitive buttons, but speaking for myself, I haven't really had the issues you mention in your post.
>volunteers for Defective By Design assembled the cardboard bricks (and had some fun doing so!).
They are fighting DRM by sending Nintendo... bricks?
Wearing pink shirts wont get Bush thrown in jail. Wearing teabags off your hat wont get Obama impeached. And sending bricks will not get DRM removed. Protest culture in America is a hobby and will not be taken seriously, as a result.
You want to stop DRM, you have to stop buying things that have it. Most people will not consider it enough of a deterrent not to, neither will most consumers even know it exists.
HTC removed locked bootloaders because a large number of power users decried it, along with a large number of competitors offering similar devices. Nintendo is the only game in town when it comes to Mario. It's great to send in emails complaining about it, but the only thing that's going to stop them from putting DRM out is a necessary public outcry (not going to happen - you need every 6 year old to care), or just them just figuring out the futility of DRM (which i'm not sure the statistics on).
Other than that, I certainly remember keeping tabs on my roommate debts and loans during college, but it was never much of a chore and didn't bother writing it down. I guess some people may need this more than others, for example people with lots of outstanding buddy debt, but I can't see it being a huge number.
What are your plans for expanding this? Simply keeping it as is and doing one thing well? It may serve to function better if it helped those key users manage their debt, using burn down charts for a game effect, or something. Maybe tying it into a mint account (is there an API?) so it can show up on top of their personal finances? Maybe just adding a tip calculator/bill splitter typical app functionality, so people can get rid of their old one and encourage them to download this?
I'm not sure what the answer is, but at a glance it seems far too niche and not much room to grow.
This is about seeing the end of the road and realizing the greatest things you've done you can never do again. Here's a man who is considered by some the greatest american writer (words of my freshman year english prof), who felt like he would "never achieve what he was capable of"(paraphrase).
See:
http://www.jayebee.com/creations/incompleteness/incompletene...
As didactic as that comment was, I suppose I could have said grandpa. I did use grandma, however, because I don't personally have any grandpas on my facebook, and in my own experience (and evidenced from this link) there are many more grandmas than grandpas on facebook:
http://www.kenburbary.com/2011/03/facebook-demographics-revi...
Even then, however, I disagree that saying "grandma" in such a context is really that damaging. Maybe there's some point to this, but it seems unnecessarily politically correct to me.
This is an excellent pairing and will make it even harder for Google+ to get the non-HN crowd types off of FB. Great play, i'd say.
I know there was a post about how products don't need a homepage, just give an email form, but realistically I'm not likely to ever give my email out if I have that little information about a product.
You are not going to work there to do slave labor, you're getting bullet points on your resume, mentorship from senior engineers, as well as taking in the business environment which you've probably never seen before.
I hope no college student who can't find another option has decided to stick his nose up at an unpaid internship because of this post.
Not to say it could never happen, but the tradeoff on performance is just no where near worth it right now.
IANAL, but it seems like the Supreme Court would very likely rule in their favor though. Quill v N Dakota is a very similar ruling and when looking through the notes I found this:
"As we noted in Heublein, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax Comm'n, 409 U.S. 275, 280 (1972), in enacting § 381, "Congress attempted to allay the apprehension of businessmen that `mere solicitation' would subject them to state taxation. . . . Section 381 was designed to define clearly a lower limit for the exercise of [the State's power to tax]. Clarity that would remove uncertainty was Congress' primary goal.""
Really, the cheerleading is a legitimate reason to do YC, apparently.
This does give a compelling reason to join YC, though: plenty of cheerleading around YC startups.
Hipmunk is great and all, but I fail to see how a travel site adding an icon is relevant to the HN frontpage.