that's called latent demand, not induced. induced demand is people changing e.g. housing in response. like all those businesses that start around train stations.
there's another reason for some optimism about a voting-truth connection: wisdom of the crowds. As long as there isn't a strong bias to people's estimate, the average will converge on the truth.
I've got a weird split thumb board like OP, and the muscle memory for a normal keyboard is fine. I think it helps that I mostly left qwerty intact, and messed with meta keys.
humans are quite capable of generating bullshit, I don't think that's ever been in contention. doesn't mean all or even most human generated content is garbage.
Do you not consider the negative externalities when choosing what to do? Pretty sure that's normal behavior, and disregarding your impact is antisocial.
0.38 should actually just be 0.40, possibly 0.35 if the seller's generous. in physical transactions nobody pays 3.1415926 dollars for anything, even if the pricing algorithm says that's what you should charge. you just round to the nearest available coinage.
This is what the much maligned "world's police" role the US military actually plays. It's a shame the NeoCons didn't understand the point of the threat is to never have to use it. the first gulf war didn't need a round two.
land value tax is an efficient tax. No need to arbitrarily ban people from using debt. if by build smaller houses you mean make it legal and easy to do, yeah. also if the government is directly building them and selling them. but don't throw yet more requirements at developers.